Comparative analysis of thermal efficiency and combustion characteristics of three biomass stove designs for rural households

• Integrating locally appropriate technologies to enhance practical applications • Optimizing production efficiency to lower costs while boosting community income • Empowering local innovators through skill development and participatory initiatives • Driving long-term economic, social, and environmental sustainability This study presents comparative evaluation of the thermal efficiency, combustion performance, and socioeconomic outcomes of three biomass stove designs commonly used in rural households and small-scale production: an improved stove with optimized airflow, a brick-built stove, and a 200-L drum stove with air injection. Laboratory testing revealed that the enhanced stove achieved thermal efficiency of 31.98%, compared to 28.02% for the brick-built stove and 17.55% for the drum stove, representing efficiency improvements of 3.96 and 14.43% points, respectively. Heat retention was assessed by monitoring the post-combustion temperature decay of the cooking vessel under identical conditions. The improved stove exhibited a slower temperature decline, indicating more effective heat utilization within the combustion–cooking system. Field evaluations in sugar palm processing, tie-dye textile production, and blue crab processing confirmed the laboratory trends. In the tie-dye textile group, fabric output per production cycle increased by approximately 100%, while fuel consumption and processing time per batch decreased. Result showed lower thermal efficiency than the improved design but offered longer service life and reduced maintenance needs, resulting in lower cumulative operating costs. Socioeconomic surveys identified initial cost and familiarity with traditional stove designs as key adoption factors. Nevertheless, reductions in fuel use and processing time associated with the improved stove indicate tangible long-term economic benefits. Overall, the results demonstrate that biomass stove designs incorporating optimized combustion geometry and airflow management can improve thermal efficiency by more than 14% points and deliver consistent productivity gains across rural production contexts, linking engineering performance with practical socioeconomic outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.110759
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of thermal efficiency and combustion characteristics of three biomass stove designs for rural households

Mahamasuhaimi Masae, Palachai Khaonuan, Rarin Khuawaraphan, Supranee Wunsri et al.
Results in Engineering
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
article

Comparative analysis of thermal efficiency and combustion characteristics of three biomass stove designs for rural households

Mahamasuhaimi Masae, Palachai Khaonuan, Rarin Khuawaraphan, Supranee Wunsri, Kosin Teeparuksapun, Nicha Prasongchan, Auttachai Thawonsuwan, Jiranart Rongchoung, Adisak Jitphusa
article en

Abstract

• Integrating locally appropriate technologies to enhance practical applications • Optimizing production efficiency to lower costs while boosting community income • Empowering local innovators through skill development and participatory initiatives • Driving long-term economic, social, and environmental sustainability This study presents comparative evaluation of the thermal efficiency, combustion performance, and socioeconomic outcomes of three biomass stove designs commonly used in rural households and small-scale production: an improved stove with optimized airflow, a brick-built stove, and a 200-L drum stove with air injection. Laboratory testing revealed that the enhanced stove achieved thermal efficiency of 31.98%, compared to 28.02% for the brick-built stove and 17.55% for the drum stove, representing efficiency improvements of 3.96 and 14.43% points, respectively. Heat retention was assessed by monitoring the post-combustion temperature decay of the cooking vessel under identical conditions. The improved stove exhibited a slower temperature decline, indicating more effective heat utilization within the combustion–cooking system. Field evaluations in sugar palm processing, tie-dye textile production, and blue crab processing confirmed the laboratory trends. In the tie-dye textile group, fabric output per production cycle increased by approximately 100%, while fuel consumption and processing time per batch decreased. Result showed lower thermal efficiency than the improved design but offered longer service life and reduced maintenance needs, resulting in lower cumulative operating costs. Socioeconomic surveys identified initial cost and familiarity with traditional stove designs as key adoption factors. Nevertheless, reductions in fuel use and processing time associated with the improved stove indicate tangible long-term economic benefits. Overall, the results demonstrate that biomass stove designs incorporating optimized combustion geometry and airflow management can improve thermal efficiency by more than 14% points and deliver consistent productivity gains across rural production contexts, linking engineering performance with practical socioeconomic outcomes.

Results in EngineeringVol. 30
Nakhon Si Thammarat Rajabhat University (TH), Rajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya (TH)
Office of the Higher Education Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.