Predicting cotton growth, pod development, and lint yield responses to irrigation and cultivar differences in Southwest Texas

Abstract In semi-arid regions, water scarcity limit root-zone water availability, restricting cotton growth and yield. Although prior studies evaluated drought responses and cultivar variations, interactions between irrigation and cultivar-specific dynamics—validated through process-based models—remain underexplored in southwest Texas. This study addresses this gap by quantifying the effects of four irrigation treatments on two cultivars, NG 4190 B3XF and ST 4990 B3XF, using field observations and DSSAT (Decision Support System for Agro-technology Transfer) CROPGRO-Cotton model. Full (100%) and moderate (75%) irrigations were based on field data, whereas half (50%) and no (0%) treatments were simulated. Key variables include phenology, pod numbers (m -2 ), pod, stem and leaf weights (all kg ha -1 ), AGB (aboveground biomass, kg ha -1 ), height (m), LAI (leaf area index), and lint yield (kg ha -1 ). Results showed that phenology varied, with differences of 5 days in anthesis, 4 in boll formation, 2 in seed set, and 5 in maturity. Lint yield varied across treatments, with MAE (mean absolute error) values of 11% and 13% for full and moderate treatments, respectively. Full irrigation maximized growth, with NG 4190 showing higher pod number (MAE 5%), pod weight (MAE 10%), and AGB (MAE 13%) than ST 4990. Half irrigation reduced pod numbers, pod weight, and AGB in both cultivars. No irrigation caused large declines in both cultivars, with MAE of 16–19% across pod number, pod weight, and AGB. Sensitivity analysis showed strong irrigation effects on boll development and AGB. Moderate irrigation sustains ~ 90% yield by preserving boll development and optimizing cotton production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70443
Primary Topic
Research in Cotton Cultivation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting cotton growth, pod development, and lint yield responses to irrigation and cultivar differences in Southwest Texas

Xuejun Dong, Benjamin M. McKnight, Dale A. Mott, Noemi Tortorici et al.
Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment
Research in Cotton Cultivation
article

Predicting cotton growth, pod development, and lint yield responses to irrigation and cultivar differences in Southwest Texas

Xuejun Dong, Benjamin M. McKnight, Dale A. Mott, Noemi Tortorici, Uzair Ahmad, Thiago F. Duarte
article en

Abstract

Abstract In semi-arid regions, water scarcity limit root-zone water availability, restricting cotton growth and yield. Although prior studies evaluated drought responses and cultivar variations, interactions between irrigation and cultivar-specific dynamics—validated through process-based models—remain underexplored in southwest Texas. This study addresses this gap by quantifying the effects of four irrigation treatments on two cultivars, NG 4190 B3XF and ST 4990 B3XF, using field observations and DSSAT (Decision Support System for Agro-technology Transfer) CROPGRO-Cotton model. Full (100%) and moderate (75%) irrigations were based on field data, whereas half (50%) and no (0%) treatments were simulated. Key variables include phenology, pod numbers (m -2 ), pod, stem and leaf weights (all kg ha -1 ), AGB (aboveground biomass, kg ha -1 ), height (m), LAI (leaf area index), and lint yield (kg ha -1 ). Results showed that phenology varied, with differences of 5 days in anthesis, 4 in boll formation, 2 in seed set, and 5 in maturity. Lint yield varied across treatments, with MAE (mean absolute error) values of 11% and 13% for full and moderate treatments, respectively. Full irrigation maximized growth, with NG 4190 showing higher pod number (MAE 5%), pod weight (MAE 10%), and AGB (MAE 13%) than ST 4990. Half irrigation reduced pod numbers, pod weight, and AGB in both cultivars. No irrigation caused large declines in both cultivars, with MAE of 16–19% across pod number, pod weight, and AGB. Sensitivity analysis showed strong irrigation effects on boll development and AGB. Moderate irrigation sustains ~ 90% yield by preserving boll development and optimizing cotton production.

Agrosystems Geosciences & EnvironmentVol. 9(3)
Universidade Federal de Rondônia (BR), Texas A&M University System (US), Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (BR), University of Palermo (IT), Texas A&M University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cotton Incorporated, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Università degli Studi di Palermo, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Division of Graduate Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Research in Cotton Cultivation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.