Patient preference for telemedicine as an alternative to in-person community care in the Veterans Health Administration

IntroductionVeterans Health Administration (VA) funding of community care (i.e., non-VA clinicians contracted by VA) aims to improve access for veterans; however, community care expenditures rose five-fold from $7.9 billion to $40 billion between fiscal years 2014 and 2024. VA telemedicine offers a convenient, high-quality alternative to some types of community care. We examined patient preferences for VA video visit versus in-person community care.MethodsThis cross-sectional study combined primary data from a national survey of patients who received both VA and community in-person care plus VA video visits (April to June 2023) with VA administrative data. We assessed the proportion of patients who preferred VA video visits versus community care in-person, and reasons for preference. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify predictors of preference.ResultsFully 44% of patients had either no preference (24%) or preferred a VA video visit (20%) over a community in-person visit in future. Top reasons for preferring a VA video visit were: convenience, avoiding infection, shorter wait times, and VA care quality, further stratified across six service areas. Two significant predictors of preference for VA video care were: (1) having a prior positive VA video visit experience (odds ratio (OR) = 2.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.55, 3.14) and (2) having a prior negative community care referral and authorization experience (OR = 2.69, 95% CI = 1.10, 6.59).DiscussionContinued support for VA providers and patients in their digital training and device access for a positive telemedicine experience could encourage many patients among the millions referred to community care to stay with VA care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633x261435258
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient preference for telemedicine as an alternative to in-person community care in the Veterans Health Administration

Donna M. Zulman, Anushka Sista, Josephine Jacobs, Lynn Garvin et al.
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

Patient preference for telemedicine as an alternative to in-person community care in the Veterans Health Administration

Donna M. Zulman, Anushka Sista, Josephine Jacobs, Lynn Garvin, Charlie M. Wray, Kimberly L. L. Harvey, Donald McInnes, Mark Meterko
article en

Abstract

IntroductionVeterans Health Administration (VA) funding of community care (i.e., non-VA clinicians contracted by VA) aims to improve access for veterans; however, community care expenditures rose five-fold from $7.9 billion to $40 billion between fiscal years 2014 and 2024. VA telemedicine offers a convenient, high-quality alternative to some types of community care. We examined patient preferences for VA video visit versus in-person community care.MethodsThis cross-sectional study combined primary data from a national survey of patients who received both VA and community in-person care plus VA video visits (April to June 2023) with VA administrative data. We assessed the proportion of patients who preferred VA video visits versus community care in-person, and reasons for preference. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify predictors of preference.ResultsFully 44% of patients had either no preference (24%) or preferred a VA video visit (20%) over a community in-person visit in future. Top reasons for preferring a VA video visit were: convenience, avoiding infection, shorter wait times, and VA care quality, further stratified across six service areas. Two significant predictors of preference for VA video care were: (1) having a prior positive VA video visit experience (odds ratio (OR) = 2.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.55, 3.14) and (2) having a prior negative community care referral and authorization experience (OR = 2.69, 95% CI = 1.10, 6.59).DiscussionContinued support for VA providers and patients in their digital training and device access for a positive telemedicine experience could encourage many patients among the millions referred to community care to stay with VA care.

Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Boston University (US), United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US), Veterans Health Administration (US), Bedford VA Research Corporation (US), Office of Patient Care Services (US), San Francisco VA Health Care System (US), Stanford University (US)
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.