Trend Analyses on Interventional Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation From 2016 to 2022: Insights From a Multicenter Hospital Database of Left Atrial Catheter Ablation Cases

BACKGROUND: Current real-world data on the utilization of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation (CA) are scarce, as is information on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on trends in interventional AF treatment. Aims of this study were to describe case characteristics and trends of CA management using a contemporary multicenter database. METHODS: In this retrospective, cross-sectional analysis, we investigated administrative data provided by 87 German hospitals from 01/01/2016 to 12/15/2022. Based on ICD-10 and OPS codes, inpatient cases with a main or secondary discharge diagnosis of AF who underwent CA were extracted. Incidence-rate ratios (IRR) for case numbers with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using negative binomial models. Trends based on regression analysis were adjusted for baseline variables. RESULTS: Analyzing 29 144 CA cases (89.4% from high-volume centers), a significant increase in case numbers was observed throughout the study period (IRR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07, p < 0.001). There was no sustained impact on the overall trend from the COVID-19 pandemic, but a temporary drop in case numbers in 2020. Utilization of transesophageal echocardiography (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.81-0.83, p < 0.001) and intensive care treatment declined (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.89-0.94, p < 0.001) and there was a trend toward a reduced incidence of pericardial tamponade. The ratio of cryoablations to radiofrequency CA case numbers increased from 0.29 ± 0.06 in 2016 to 0.50 ± 0.07 in 2022. CONCLUSION: We observed an increase in AF CA case numbers over the study period without a sustained influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on this long-term trend. Reported adaptations in CA management deserve further attention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cardiology
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.70280
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trend Analyses on Interventional Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation From 2016 to 2022: Insights From a Multicenter Hospital Database of Left Atrial Catheter Ablation Cases

Johannes Leiner, Christopher Reithmann, Sven Hohenstein, Frank Steinborn et al.
Clinical Cardiology
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Trend Analyses on Interventional Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation From 2016 to 2022: Insights From a Multicenter Hospital Database of Left Atrial Catheter Ablation Cases

Johannes Leiner, Christopher Reithmann, Sven Hohenstein, Frank Steinborn, Alexander Staudt, Anne Nitsche, Melchior Seyfarth, H T Baberg, Armin Sause, Carsten Wunderlich, Kerstin Bode, Michael Niehaus, Sebastian König, Michael Wiedemann, Dong‐In Shin, Andreas Bollmann, Jürgen Tebbenjohanns
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current real-world data on the utilization of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation (CA) are scarce, as is information on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on trends in interventional AF treatment. Aims of this study were to describe case characteristics and trends of CA management using a contemporary multicenter database. METHODS: In this retrospective, cross-sectional analysis, we investigated administrative data provided by 87 German hospitals from 01/01/2016 to 12/15/2022. Based on ICD-10 and OPS codes, inpatient cases with a main or secondary discharge diagnosis of AF who underwent CA were extracted. Incidence-rate ratios (IRR) for case numbers with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using negative binomial models. Trends based on regression analysis were adjusted for baseline variables. RESULTS: Analyzing 29 144 CA cases (89.4% from high-volume centers), a significant increase in case numbers was observed throughout the study period (IRR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07, p < 0.001). There was no sustained impact on the overall trend from the COVID-19 pandemic, but a temporary drop in case numbers in 2020. Utilization of transesophageal echocardiography (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.81-0.83, p < 0.001) and intensive care treatment declined (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.89-0.94, p < 0.001) and there was a trend toward a reduced incidence of pericardial tamponade. The ratio of cryoablations to radiofrequency CA case numbers increased from 0.29 ± 0.06 in 2016 to 0.50 ± 0.07 in 2022. CONCLUSION: We observed an increase in AF CA case numbers over the study period without a sustained influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on this long-term trend. Reported adaptations in CA management deserve further attention.

Clinical CardiologyVol. 49(5)
University of Hildesheim (DE), Asklepios Klinik Altona (DE), Stadtarchiv Gifhorn (DE), Helios Hospital Schwerin (DE), Helios Klinikum Krefeld (DE), Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment GmbH (AT), Leipzig Heart Institute (DE), Helios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal (DE), München Klinik (DE), Helios Klinikum Erfurt (DE), Helios Hospital Berlin-Buch (DE)
Biosense Webster
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.