Navigating effective knowledge management tools and practices for sustainable agriculture

Purpose The transition toward sustainable agriculture requires not only technological innovation but also robust knowledge-based systems capable of supporting complex and multidimensional decision-making processes. However, existing studies provide limited theoretical insight into how diverse knowledge management (KM) mechanisms interact and collectively contribute to sustainability outcomes in the presence of economic, social, and environmental trade-offs. This study aims to both theoretically conceptualize and empirically evaluate the relative contributions of knowledge-based tools and practices to sustainable agricultural systems. Design/methodology/approach This study proposes a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework that integrates the analytic network process (ANP) and the axial distance based aggregated measurement (ADAM) to systematically quantify the relative contributions of knowledge-based tools and practices to sustainable agriculture. Fifteen knowledge-based tools and fifteen knowledge-based practices were identified through an extensive literature review and subsequently validated by an expert panel. The evaluation criteria were structured across four dimensions: knowledge enhancement, economic, social, and environmental sustainability. ANP was employed to derive global priority weights while accounting for interdependencies among criteria, and these weights were incorporated into the ADAM method to generate a geometric distance-based ranking of alternatives. Findings The results indicate that economic considerations exert the strongest influence on expert evaluations. Nevertheless, knowledge-based tools that enable real-time knowledge exchange and experiential learning, such as Internet of Things (IoT) technologies, peer-to-peer resource sharing systems, and decision support systems, emerged as the highest-ranked tools. Among knowledge-based practices, knowledge-sharing forums, mentoring and mentee schemes and best practices achieved the highest rankings. Originality/value Beyond methodological integration, this study advances theory by conceptualizing knowledge-based systems as interconnected and mutually reinforcing mechanisms that underpin sustainability in agricultural systems. Moreover, the proposed framework offers practical and strategic insights for policymakers, practitioners and agricultural stakeholders seeking to align KM investments with long-term sustainability objectives in a systematic and evidence-informed manner.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EuroMed Journal of Business
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/emjb-12-2025-0491
Primary Topic
Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating effective knowledge management tools and practices for sustainable agriculture

Pier Paolo Miglietta, Mladen Dragan Krstić, Zahra Ardakani, Leonardo Agnusdei et al.
EuroMed Journal of Business
Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
article

Navigating effective knowledge management tools and practices for sustainable agriculture

Pier Paolo Miglietta, Mladen Dragan Krstić, Zahra Ardakani, Leonardo Agnusdei, Giuseppe Orlando, Pamela Palmi
article en

Abstract

Purpose The transition toward sustainable agriculture requires not only technological innovation but also robust knowledge-based systems capable of supporting complex and multidimensional decision-making processes. However, existing studies provide limited theoretical insight into how diverse knowledge management (KM) mechanisms interact and collectively contribute to sustainability outcomes in the presence of economic, social, and environmental trade-offs. This study aims to both theoretically conceptualize and empirically evaluate the relative contributions of knowledge-based tools and practices to sustainable agricultural systems. Design/methodology/approach This study proposes a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework that integrates the analytic network process (ANP) and the axial distance based aggregated measurement (ADAM) to systematically quantify the relative contributions of knowledge-based tools and practices to sustainable agriculture. Fifteen knowledge-based tools and fifteen knowledge-based practices were identified through an extensive literature review and subsequently validated by an expert panel. The evaluation criteria were structured across four dimensions: knowledge enhancement, economic, social, and environmental sustainability. ANP was employed to derive global priority weights while accounting for interdependencies among criteria, and these weights were incorporated into the ADAM method to generate a geometric distance-based ranking of alternatives. Findings The results indicate that economic considerations exert the strongest influence on expert evaluations. Nevertheless, knowledge-based tools that enable real-time knowledge exchange and experiential learning, such as Internet of Things (IoT) technologies, peer-to-peer resource sharing systems, and decision support systems, emerged as the highest-ranked tools. Among knowledge-based practices, knowledge-sharing forums, mentoring and mentee schemes and best practices achieved the highest rankings. Originality/value Beyond methodological integration, this study advances theory by conceptualizing knowledge-based systems as interconnected and mutually reinforcing mechanisms that underpin sustainability in agricultural systems. Moreover, the proposed framework offers practical and strategic insights for policymakers, practitioners and agricultural stakeholders seeking to align KM investments with long-term sustainability objectives in a systematic and evidence-informed manner.

EuroMed Journal of Business
University of Salento (IT), University of Belgrade (RS), Pegaso University (IT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.