Experiences of type 2 diabetes stigma in healthcare settings: a mixed-methods systematic review

International consensus highlights the urgent need to address diabetes stigma in healthcare. This systematic review synthesised qualitative and quantitative evidence to provide context-specific insights into type 2 diabetes (T2D) stigma in healthcare settings. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO (from inception to December 2025). Data were analysed thematically using a hybrid deductive-inductive coding approach guided by the Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework (HSDF), examining four key domains of stigma: manifestations, drivers/facilitators, markers, and impacts. Sixty-one articles from 32 countries were included. Individuals with T2D perceived, experienced, anticipated, and internalised T2D stigma, perpetuated through healthcare professionals' (HCPs') communication, attitudes, and practices. T2D stigma was driven by negative emotional reactions, stereotypes, authoritarianism, and lack of knowledge; and facilitated by overly simplistic care models and healthcare-related media misrepresentation. Negative impacts spanned psychosocial well-being, health-seeking behaviours, quality of care, and interpersonal relationships with HCPs. People with T2D called for HCPs and system-level reforms to foster stigma-free T2D healthcare. These findings strengthen the understanding of T2D stigma in healthcare, including its pervasiveness and consequences, and reveal actionable drivers and facilitators, which can be used to develop targeted interventions and guidance towards stigma-free T2D care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2026.113283
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experiences of type 2 diabetes stigma in healthcare settings: a mixed-methods systematic review

Elizabeth Holmes‐Truscott, Matthew Garza, Emmanuel Ekpor, Sarah Manallack et al.
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Diabetes Management and Education
article

Experiences of type 2 diabetes stigma in healthcare settings: a mixed-methods systematic review

Elizabeth Holmes‐Truscott, Matthew Garza, Emmanuel Ekpor, Sarah Manallack, Jane Speight
article en

Abstract

International consensus highlights the urgent need to address diabetes stigma in healthcare. This systematic review synthesised qualitative and quantitative evidence to provide context-specific insights into type 2 diabetes (T2D) stigma in healthcare settings. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO (from inception to December 2025). Data were analysed thematically using a hybrid deductive-inductive coding approach guided by the Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework (HSDF), examining four key domains of stigma: manifestations, drivers/facilitators, markers, and impacts. Sixty-one articles from 32 countries were included. Individuals with T2D perceived, experienced, anticipated, and internalised T2D stigma, perpetuated through healthcare professionals' (HCPs') communication, attitudes, and practices. T2D stigma was driven by negative emotional reactions, stereotypes, authoritarianism, and lack of knowledge; and facilitated by overly simplistic care models and healthcare-related media misrepresentation. Negative impacts spanned psychosocial well-being, health-seeking behaviours, quality of care, and interpersonal relationships with HCPs. People with T2D called for HCPs and system-level reforms to foster stigma-free T2D healthcare. These findings strengthen the understanding of T2D stigma in healthcare, including its pervasiveness and consequences, and reveal actionable drivers and facilitators, which can be used to develop targeted interventions and guidance towards stigma-free T2D care.

Diabetes Research and Clinical PracticeVol. 236
Deakin University (AU), San Francisco Foundation (US)
Australian Government, Deakin University, Diabetes Victoria
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Diabetes Management and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.