How Nigerian households with non-communicable diseases combine coping strategies during health shocks: evidence from the Nigeria Living Standards Survey (2018–2019)

Introduction Health shocks, sudden serious illness, disability, or death of income-earning members, threaten household welfare in developing countries. This study examines how Nigerian households with non-communicable diseases (NCDs) combine coping strategies in response to health shocks, thereby addressing gaps in understanding multi-strategy decision-making processes.Theory We employ a two-hurdle decision-making framework, where households first decide whether to engage in active coping and then determine the strategy combinations. The political economy perspective frames how healthcare financing systems and social protection infrastructure shape vulnerability and coping capacity.Method Using the 2018/2019 Nigeria Living Standards Survey data, we analysed 2,568 households through double-hurdle extended regression models, addressing endogeneity. We examined 10 active coping strategies, applying community-clustered standard errors and multiple robustness checks.Results The results indicate that 68.65% of participants employed coping strategies, with 51.48% utilising multiple strategies. NCD-affected households used more strategies (3.65 vs. 3.29) and were 8% more likely to participate and 20% more likely to use multiple strategies, most of which were maladaptive. Common strategies included reducing food consumption (61%), informal assistance (57.8%), and reducing non-food consumption (52.3%). Credit access increased participation (26%) and strategy count (53%); health insurance reduced participation (12%). Socioeconomic disparities were substantial, with Southern zones exhibiting 21%–25% higher participation rates, and the poorest households being 42% less likely to employ multiple strategies.Discussion The findings reveal a heightened vulnerability of NCD-affected households because of the limited availability of formal support. We recommend conditional cash transfers, subsidised insurance, targeted interventions, including employment-based health benefits, for NCD-affected households.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Public Health
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2026.2660451
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Nigerian households with non-communicable diseases combine coping strategies during health shocks: evidence from the Nigeria Living Standards Survey (2018–2019)

Adelakun Odunyemi, Khurshid Alam, Hamid Sohrabi
Critical Public Health
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
article

How Nigerian households with non-communicable diseases combine coping strategies during health shocks: evidence from the Nigeria Living Standards Survey (2018–2019)

Adelakun Odunyemi, Khurshid Alam, Hamid Sohrabi
article en

Abstract

Introduction Health shocks, sudden serious illness, disability, or death of income-earning members, threaten household welfare in developing countries. This study examines how Nigerian households with non-communicable diseases (NCDs) combine coping strategies in response to health shocks, thereby addressing gaps in understanding multi-strategy decision-making processes.Theory We employ a two-hurdle decision-making framework, where households first decide whether to engage in active coping and then determine the strategy combinations. The political economy perspective frames how healthcare financing systems and social protection infrastructure shape vulnerability and coping capacity.Method Using the 2018/2019 Nigeria Living Standards Survey data, we analysed 2,568 households through double-hurdle extended regression models, addressing endogeneity. We examined 10 active coping strategies, applying community-clustered standard errors and multiple robustness checks.Results The results indicate that 68.65% of participants employed coping strategies, with 51.48% utilising multiple strategies. NCD-affected households used more strategies (3.65 vs. 3.29) and were 8% more likely to participate and 20% more likely to use multiple strategies, most of which were maladaptive. Common strategies included reducing food consumption (61%), informal assistance (57.8%), and reducing non-food consumption (52.3%). Credit access increased participation (26%) and strategy count (53%); health insurance reduced participation (12%). Socioeconomic disparities were substantial, with Southern zones exhibiting 21%–25% higher participation rates, and the poorest households being 42% less likely to employ multiple strategies.Discussion The findings reveal a heightened vulnerability of NCD-affected households because of the limited availability of formal support. We recommend conditional cash transfers, subsidised insurance, targeted interventions, including employment-based health benefits, for NCD-affected households.

Critical Public HealthVol. 36(1)
Murdoch University (AU), Futures Group (United States) (US), State Board of Education (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.