Exploring linguistic characteristics across CEFR writing levels and their relationships with student backgrounds

This study attempted to identify significant linguistic features that distinguish across CEFR writing levels. The sample included essays from 959 German-speaking EFL students on two tasks: an Independent argumentative task and an Integrated summarizing task. Using natural language processing tools, 19 linguistic features encompassing fluency, lexical, syntactic, and cohesion dimensions were extracted and analyzed through ANOVAs and post-hoc tests. Additionally, regression analyses were conducted to investigate significant predictors of CEFR writing levels with both linguistic features and students’ background variables included in the models. The results indicated that fluency features significantly differentiated CEFR levels in both tasks. However, the patterns of other significant features varied depending on the task type. The students’ self-assessment factor was also found to be a strong predictor of CEFR writing levels. These findings offer practical implications, including the importance of incorporating various genres in writing assessment and instruction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Second Language Writing
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2026.101308
Primary Topic
Writing and Handwriting Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring linguistic characteristics across CEFR writing levels and their relationships with student backgrounds

Chunyi Ruan, Paul Deane, Mikyung Kim Wolf, Stefan D. Keller et al.
Journal of Second Language Writing
Writing and Handwriting Education
article

Exploring linguistic characteristics across CEFR writing levels and their relationships with student backgrounds

Chunyi Ruan, Paul Deane, Mikyung Kim Wolf, Stefan D. Keller, Michael Suhan
article en

Abstract

This study attempted to identify significant linguistic features that distinguish across CEFR writing levels. The sample included essays from 959 German-speaking EFL students on two tasks: an Independent argumentative task and an Integrated summarizing task. Using natural language processing tools, 19 linguistic features encompassing fluency, lexical, syntactic, and cohesion dimensions were extracted and analyzed through ANOVAs and post-hoc tests. Additionally, regression analyses were conducted to investigate significant predictors of CEFR writing levels with both linguistic features and students’ background variables included in the models. The results indicated that fluency features significantly differentiated CEFR levels in both tasks. However, the patterns of other significant features varied depending on the task type. The students’ self-assessment factor was also found to be a strong predictor of CEFR writing levels. These findings offer practical implications, including the importance of incorporating various genres in writing assessment and instruction.

Journal of Second Language WritingVol. 72
University of Teacher Education Zug (CH)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Writing and Handwriting Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.