Regional Flood Emergency Capacity Assessment Based on a Multidimensional Framework

ABSTRACT Knowing the status of emergency capacity for disaster risk reduction helps the government and stakeholders to minimize vulnerabilities and disaster risk. However, there is no widely applied methodology for emergency capacity assessment. This study develops a multidimensional framework integrating vulnerability, susceptibility, and adaptability assessments to evaluate regional flood emergency capacity. The information quantity method, the Maxent model, and the entropy‐weighted TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) are used to assess the regional vulnerability, susceptibility, and adaptability of disaster emergency capacity, respectively. These capacity features are then integrated into the overall disaster capacity using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP)‐entropy method. The exemplary application in Zengcheng District (ZCD), China shows the effectiveness of the proposed method. The identified vulnerability hotspots of flood over ZCD are located in Xintang and southern Yongning, driven by their high road density, GDP per capita, residential disposable income, and high population density. Susceptibility modeling revealed land use, Vegetation Index, and elevation as the dominant drivers, with Xintang exhibiting the highest risk. Adaptability assessments highlighted superior resilience in Paitan, Zhongxin, and Shitan, driven by enhanced disaster‐preparedness investments. Integrated analysis prioritized emergency resource storage capacity, drainage capacity, and emergency rescue capacity as critical determinants of flood response capacity. Lower emergency capacity is concentrated in Zhongxin, Xiaolou, Zhenguo, and Zhucun. This paper constructs a multidimensional assessment framework covering the entire chain of pre‐disaster prevention, in‐disaster response, and post‐disaster recovery, to systematically evaluate a region's comprehensive emergency capacity, providing potentially feasible insights for urban areas vulnerable to flood disasters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Published
2026-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.70216
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regional Flood Emergency Capacity Assessment Based on a Multidimensional Framework

Lixiang Song, X F. Li, Xuezhi Tan, Yi Wu et al.
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Regional Flood Emergency Capacity Assessment Based on a Multidimensional Framework

Lixiang Song, X F. Li, Xuezhi Tan, Yi Wu, Fang Yang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Knowing the status of emergency capacity for disaster risk reduction helps the government and stakeholders to minimize vulnerabilities and disaster risk. However, there is no widely applied methodology for emergency capacity assessment. This study develops a multidimensional framework integrating vulnerability, susceptibility, and adaptability assessments to evaluate regional flood emergency capacity. The information quantity method, the Maxent model, and the entropy‐weighted TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) are used to assess the regional vulnerability, susceptibility, and adaptability of disaster emergency capacity, respectively. These capacity features are then integrated into the overall disaster capacity using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP)‐entropy method. The exemplary application in Zengcheng District (ZCD), China shows the effectiveness of the proposed method. The identified vulnerability hotspots of flood over ZCD are located in Xintang and southern Yongning, driven by their high road density, GDP per capita, residential disposable income, and high population density. Susceptibility modeling revealed land use, Vegetation Index, and elevation as the dominant drivers, with Xintang exhibiting the highest risk. Adaptability assessments highlighted superior resilience in Paitan, Zhongxin, and Shitan, driven by enhanced disaster‐preparedness investments. Integrated analysis prioritized emergency resource storage capacity, drainage capacity, and emergency rescue capacity as critical determinants of flood response capacity. Lower emergency capacity is concentrated in Zhongxin, Xiaolou, Zhenguo, and Zhucun. This paper constructs a multidimensional assessment framework covering the entire chain of pre‐disaster prevention, in‐disaster response, and post‐disaster recovery, to systematically evaluate a region's comprehensive emergency capacity, providing potentially feasible insights for urban areas vulnerable to flood disasters.

Journal of Flood Risk ManagementVol. 19(2)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering (CN), Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou) (CN), Scientific Institute of Pearl River Water Resources Protection (CN), Pearl River Hydraulic Research Institute (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.