Disenfranchisement and poverty in the post-settlement phase of Māori claims

Since 1995, Māori tribes have received NZ$ 4.6 billion in compensation for grievances concerning their dispossession in the colonial history of New Zealand, but studies of the influence of settlements on the ‘well-being’ of Māori beneficiaries are scarce. This article reflects on the first major settlement, which was signed with the Waikato-Tainui tribe whose entire territory was confiscated in 1864. After 30 years, the settlement has increased in value to NZ$ 1.9 billion, but, for a variety of reasons, tribal members hardly benefit from the restitution of resources and the growth of the tribal estate. Resources of all tribal beneficiaries have been collectivized under the governance of a tribal corporation that aims at preventing fragmentation in order to enhance their capital value. As a consequence, however, the settlement is deepening the disenfranchisement of tribal members, who have no further avenues for seeking redress for their deprivation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critique of Anthropology
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275x261446396
Primary Topic
New Zealand Economic and Social Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disenfranchisement and poverty in the post-settlement phase of Māori claims

Toon van Meijl
Critique of Anthropology
New Zealand Economic and Social Studies
article

Disenfranchisement and poverty in the post-settlement phase of Māori claims

Toon van Meijl
article en

Abstract

Since 1995, Māori tribes have received NZ$ 4.6 billion in compensation for grievances concerning their dispossession in the colonial history of New Zealand, but studies of the influence of settlements on the ‘well-being’ of Māori beneficiaries are scarce. This article reflects on the first major settlement, which was signed with the Waikato-Tainui tribe whose entire territory was confiscated in 1864. After 30 years, the settlement has increased in value to NZ$ 1.9 billion, but, for a variety of reasons, tribal members hardly benefit from the restitution of resources and the growth of the tribal estate. Resources of all tribal beneficiaries have been collectivized under the governance of a tribal corporation that aims at preventing fragmentation in order to enhance their capital value. As a consequence, however, the settlement is deepening the disenfranchisement of tribal members, who have no further avenues for seeking redress for their deprivation.

Critique of Anthropology
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
New Zealand Economic and Social Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.