Testing eDNA Sampling Approaches in Tropical Waterways for Citizen Science and Conservation Applications

ABSTRACT Citizen science is increasingly popular but requires training and modifications to sampling procedures so that volunteer‐collected environmental DNA (eDNA) samples can be included in biodiversity surveys. In this study, we optimised methodology for a citizen science project targeting fish taxa; ensuring simple, safe and effective eDNA sampling. We compared species richness and composition of fish eDNA data obtained from a single type of passive sampler with that obtained from Longmire's preserved water samples at three waterways in north Queensland, Australia. The results showed substantial differences in richness and species composition between the two sampling approaches assessed using cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) and mitochondrial 16S assays. Longmire's preserved water samples resulted in higher read abundances and greater richness for both assays. The fish composition differed between the two sampling approaches, despite identical sampling locations and times. This study demonstrates how two different sampling and preservation approaches can lead to different fish detection results in tropical aquatic systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.70380
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing eDNA Sampling Approaches in Tropical Waterways for Citizen Science and Conservation Applications

Cecilia Villacorta‐Rath, Sarah Stephenson, Geoffrey M. Collins, Sharon E. Hook
Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
article

Testing eDNA Sampling Approaches in Tropical Waterways for Citizen Science and Conservation Applications

Cecilia Villacorta‐Rath, Sarah Stephenson, Geoffrey M. Collins, Sharon E. Hook
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Citizen science is increasingly popular but requires training and modifications to sampling procedures so that volunteer‐collected environmental DNA (eDNA) samples can be included in biodiversity surveys. In this study, we optimised methodology for a citizen science project targeting fish taxa; ensuring simple, safe and effective eDNA sampling. We compared species richness and composition of fish eDNA data obtained from a single type of passive sampler with that obtained from Longmire's preserved water samples at three waterways in north Queensland, Australia. The results showed substantial differences in richness and species composition between the two sampling approaches assessed using cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) and mitochondrial 16S assays. Longmire's preserved water samples resulted in higher read abundances and greater richness for both assays. The fish composition differed between the two sampling approaches, despite identical sampling locations and times. This study demonstrates how two different sampling and preservation approaches can lead to different fish detection results in tropical aquatic systems.

Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater EcosystemsVol. 36(5)
CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere (AU), Townsville Hospital (AU), Queensland Department of Environment and Science (AU), James Cook University (AU)
Great Barrier Reef Foundation
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.