Spectroscopic ellipsometric evaluation of multilayer thin-film roughness using a genetic algorithm

Accurate characterization of thin films with complex surface roughness requires precise modeling of both the film and its interfaces. In ellipsometry, surface roughness can be described using Bruggeman, Lorenz-Lorenz, or Maxwell-Garnett effective medium approximations (EMAs). Here, we adopt the Maxwell-Garnett EMA because it provides a simple yet physically meaningful representation of a composite air/material layer, accurately accounting for the volumetric fraction of inclusions while remaining computationally efficient. The model comprises two roughness sublayers atop a dense SiO2 layer, each represented as an air/SiO2 mixture with decreasing volume fractions according to Maxwell-Garnett theory. The substrate optical constants are known, and the dense layer is described using a fixed Lorentz model. Ellipsometric intensities (Is and Ic) are computed via the transfer matrix method (TMM) in MATLAB and treated as simulated data. A genetic algorithm (GA) is used to invert these data and extract key opto-geometrical parameters, including the dense layer’s refractive index, layer thicknesses, and porosity fractions. Results show that the multilayer EMA combined with GA enables more accurate and robust parameter retrieval, particularly for complex roughness profiles. The approach is experimentally validated on a resin thin film deposited on a silicon substrate, providing a reliable framework for optical characterization of rough thin-film surfaces.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2026-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjap/2026003/pdf
Primary Topic
Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spectroscopic ellipsometric evaluation of multilayer thin-film roughness using a genetic algorithm

Amir Moungache, Stéphane Robert, S. Capraro, Ngoidita Natebaye
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
article

Spectroscopic ellipsometric evaluation of multilayer thin-film roughness using a genetic algorithm

Amir Moungache, Stéphane Robert, S. Capraro, Ngoidita Natebaye
article en

Abstract

Accurate characterization of thin films with complex surface roughness requires precise modeling of both the film and its interfaces. In ellipsometry, surface roughness can be described using Bruggeman, Lorenz-Lorenz, or Maxwell-Garnett effective medium approximations (EMAs). Here, we adopt the Maxwell-Garnett EMA because it provides a simple yet physically meaningful representation of a composite air/material layer, accurately accounting for the volumetric fraction of inclusions while remaining computationally efficient. The model comprises two roughness sublayers atop a dense SiO2 layer, each represented as an air/SiO2 mixture with decreasing volume fractions according to Maxwell-Garnett theory. The substrate optical constants are known, and the dense layer is described using a fixed Lorentz model. Ellipsometric intensities (Is and Ic) are computed via the transfer matrix method (TMM) in MATLAB and treated as simulated data. A genetic algorithm (GA) is used to invert these data and extract key opto-geometrical parameters, including the dense layer’s refractive index, layer thicknesses, and porosity fractions. Results show that the multilayer EMA combined with GA enables more accurate and robust parameter retrieval, particularly for complex roughness profiles. The approach is experimentally validated on a resin thin film deposited on a silicon substrate, providing a reliable framework for optical characterization of rough thin-film surfaces.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.