Characterization of alternative materials for bolus fabrication in radiotherapy

In certain radiotherapy protocols, a more superficial dose distribution is required, necessitating the use of a bolus to ensure adequate dose delivery to the skin and subcutaneous tissues. Although commercially available bolus materials are widely recognized and employed for this purpose, their availability remains limited in many radiotherapy centers across Brazil. This study aimed to evaluate the percentage depth dose (PDD) curve, skin entrance dose, depth of maximum dose, and dose profile to determine the suitability of alternative bolus materials fabricated from gauze and disposable cloth. Dosimetric data were acquired using a 6 MV beam from a linear accelerator, a treatment planning system (TPS), computed tomography (CT), radiochromic film, and an ionization chamber. When compared to the commercial bolus, the disposable cloth bolus demonstrated superior performance relative to gauze, achieving a greater superficial dose increase (0.54 cm vs. 0.24 cm). Both alternative materials increased the skin entrance dose in comparison to treatments without a bolus. However, when benchmarked against the commercial bolus, they exhibited lower efficiency, with reductions of 44% and 29% observed for gauze and disposable cloth, respectively. While alternative bolus materials enhanced surface dose delivery, the reduction in depth of maximum dose remained inferior to that provided by the commercial bolus. In terms of dose profile homogeneity, the disposable cloth bolus outperformed gauze, likely due to its tighter and more uniform weave structure. These findings suggest that the disposable cloth bolus presents a promising alternative for routine clinical application, particularly in settings where standard commercial bolus materials are unavailable. • Low-cost gauze and disposable cloth materials were evaluated for use as bolus in radiotherapy. • These alternative bolus materials increased skin entrance dose compared to no bolus. • Disposable cloth bolus showed better superficial dose enhancement than gauze. • Commercial bolus remained more effective in reducing the depth of maximum dose. • Disposable cloth bolus showed improved dose profile homogeneity over gauze.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiation Physics and Chemistry
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2026.113977
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterization of alternative materials for bolus fabrication in radiotherapy

Maíra T. Yoshizumi, Hélia B. Barbosa, João Vinícius B. Valença, Rômulo R. Santos et al.
Radiation Physics and Chemistry
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Characterization of alternative materials for bolus fabrication in radiotherapy

Maíra T. Yoshizumi, Hélia B. Barbosa, João Vinícius B. Valença, Rômulo R. Santos, Mirko S. Alva- Sánchez
article en

Abstract

In certain radiotherapy protocols, a more superficial dose distribution is required, necessitating the use of a bolus to ensure adequate dose delivery to the skin and subcutaneous tissues. Although commercially available bolus materials are widely recognized and employed for this purpose, their availability remains limited in many radiotherapy centers across Brazil. This study aimed to evaluate the percentage depth dose (PDD) curve, skin entrance dose, depth of maximum dose, and dose profile to determine the suitability of alternative bolus materials fabricated from gauze and disposable cloth. Dosimetric data were acquired using a 6 MV beam from a linear accelerator, a treatment planning system (TPS), computed tomography (CT), radiochromic film, and an ionization chamber. When compared to the commercial bolus, the disposable cloth bolus demonstrated superior performance relative to gauze, achieving a greater superficial dose increase (0.54 cm vs. 0.24 cm). Both alternative materials increased the skin entrance dose in comparison to treatments without a bolus. However, when benchmarked against the commercial bolus, they exhibited lower efficiency, with reductions of 44% and 29% observed for gauze and disposable cloth, respectively. While alternative bolus materials enhanced surface dose delivery, the reduction in depth of maximum dose remained inferior to that provided by the commercial bolus. In terms of dose profile homogeneity, the disposable cloth bolus outperformed gauze, likely due to its tighter and more uniform weave structure. These findings suggest that the disposable cloth bolus presents a promising alternative for routine clinical application, particularly in settings where standard commercial bolus materials are unavailable. • Low-cost gauze and disposable cloth materials were evaluated for use as bolus in radiotherapy. • These alternative bolus materials increased skin entrance dose compared to no bolus. • Disposable cloth bolus showed better superficial dose enhancement than gauze. • Commercial bolus remained more effective in reducing the depth of maximum dose. • Disposable cloth bolus showed improved dose profile homogeneity over gauze.

Radiation Physics and ChemistryVol. 246
Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (BR), Universidade de Brasília (BR), Santa Casa Hospital (BR), Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo (BR)
Ministério da Educação
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.