Intimate partner violence and survivor-reported partner characteristics in Ghana, Kenya, and Tanzania

BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence (IPV) remains a major global public health and humanrights challenge, with a disproportionate burden in sub-Saharan Africa. While women's experiences of IPV are well documented, fewer population-level studies examine survivor-reported partner characteristics and relational dynamics associated with perpetration. OBJECTIVE: To estimate IPV prevalence in selected sub-Saharan African countries and examine demographic, socio-relational, attitudinal, and survivor-reported partnerstructural characteristics associated with IPV. METHODS: = 59,458 ever-partnered women; 9593 reporting IPV). IPV prevalence was assessed in relation to demographic, socio-relational, and structural partnership characteristics. Random forest models were used togenerate descriptive rankings of the relative importance of selected survivor-reported partner structural characteristics across countries, with findings interpreted non-causally. RESULTS: IPV prevalence was highest in Kenya (21.28%; 95% CI: 20.71-21.87), followed by Ghana (14.26%; 95% CI: 13.56-15.02) and Tanzania (12.34%; 95% CI: 11.66-12.99). Partner economic status and occupation consistently ranked as important structural factors. Controlling behaviours were common among women experiencing IPV, with notable cross-country variation. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating carefully designed partner-related indicators into population-based surveys can strengthen IPV surveillance, inform targeted prevention strategies, and support gender-transformative policy in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Health Action
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2026.2664941
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intimate partner violence and survivor-reported partner characteristics in Ghana, Kenya, and Tanzania

Preeti Patel, Sentirenla Longchar
Global Health Action
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

Intimate partner violence and survivor-reported partner characteristics in Ghana, Kenya, and Tanzania

Preeti Patel, Sentirenla Longchar
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence (IPV) remains a major global public health and humanrights challenge, with a disproportionate burden in sub-Saharan Africa. While women's experiences of IPV are well documented, fewer population-level studies examine survivor-reported partner characteristics and relational dynamics associated with perpetration. OBJECTIVE: To estimate IPV prevalence in selected sub-Saharan African countries and examine demographic, socio-relational, attitudinal, and survivor-reported partnerstructural characteristics associated with IPV. METHODS: = 59,458 ever-partnered women; 9593 reporting IPV). IPV prevalence was assessed in relation to demographic, socio-relational, and structural partnership characteristics. Random forest models were used togenerate descriptive rankings of the relative importance of selected survivor-reported partner structural characteristics across countries, with findings interpreted non-causally. RESULTS: IPV prevalence was highest in Kenya (21.28%; 95% CI: 20.71-21.87), followed by Ghana (14.26%; 95% CI: 13.56-15.02) and Tanzania (12.34%; 95% CI: 11.66-12.99). Partner economic status and occupation consistently ranked as important structural factors. Controlling behaviours were common among women experiencing IPV, with notable cross-country variation. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating carefully designed partner-related indicators into population-based surveys can strengthen IPV surveillance, inform targeted prevention strategies, and support gender-transformative policy in sub-Saharan Africa.

Global Health ActionVol. 19(1)
London Metropolitan University (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.