Decomposed efficiency and driving mechanisms of agricultural carbon emissions: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China

Under the context of global climate change, reconciling food security with low-carbon development poses a complex spatial data challenge for agricultural basins worldwide. Existing evaluations of Agricultural Carbon Emission Efficiency (ACEE) typically rely on aggregate indicators, treating the agricultural sector as a “black box” and lacking the computational resolution to reveal structural ecological trade-offs among internal production factors. To overcome this data limitation, this study constructs a high-resolution computational decomposition framework applied to the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YEB), China (2003−2022). By integrating the Directional Distance Function (DDF) for multi-dimensional factor deconstruction, Standard Deviational Ellipse (SDE) for trajectory tracking, and Partial Least Squares Regression (PLS-R) for complex network modeling, we systematically uncover the spatiotemporal dynamics and systemic drivers of ACEE. The results demonstrate that: Abdi (2010) (1) Total-factor efficiency evolved nonlinearly, and SDE tracking visualizes a spatial drag effect driven by the decline in resource efficiency in the mid-stream regions. Charnes et al. (1978) (2) The structural decomposition exposes a severe ecological asymmetry: while labor and machinery efficiencies improved rapidly due to technological substitution, fertilizer and irrigation efficiencies remained in a state of low-value lock-in. This reveals a critical “Masking Effect” in current agricultural transformations, where capital-driven data statistically conceals deep-seated resource intensity. Chen and Kou (2014) (3) PLS-R modeling identifies systemic spatial trade-offs: urbanization and the urban-rural income gap drive technological substitution, while spatial heterogeneity—manifested as land fragmentation in mountainous terrains—induces a “Scale Paradox” that hinders ecological economies of scale. This study provides a transferable data deconstruction and diagnostic protocol for evaluating multidimensional ecological performance in global agricultural basins. • Multi-dimensional decomposition unveils the “Masking Effect” in efficiency. • SDE trajectory tracking visualizes a “Spatial Drag” from resource inefficiency. • PLS-R modeling identifies systemic ecological trade-offs in complex networks. • Spatial heterogeneity analysis exposes a “Scale Paradox” in mountainous basins. • The integrated computational framework provides a transferable diagnostic protocol.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114914
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decomposed efficiency and driving mechanisms of agricultural carbon emissions: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China

Shuangfei Zhao, Mohan Peng, Chunhua Li, Lei Wang et al.
Ecological Indicators
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Decomposed efficiency and driving mechanisms of agricultural carbon emissions: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China

Shuangfei Zhao, Mohan Peng, Chunhua Li, Lei Wang, Jing Zhao
article en

Abstract

Under the context of global climate change, reconciling food security with low-carbon development poses a complex spatial data challenge for agricultural basins worldwide. Existing evaluations of Agricultural Carbon Emission Efficiency (ACEE) typically rely on aggregate indicators, treating the agricultural sector as a “black box” and lacking the computational resolution to reveal structural ecological trade-offs among internal production factors. To overcome this data limitation, this study constructs a high-resolution computational decomposition framework applied to the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YEB), China (2003−2022). By integrating the Directional Distance Function (DDF) for multi-dimensional factor deconstruction, Standard Deviational Ellipse (SDE) for trajectory tracking, and Partial Least Squares Regression (PLS-R) for complex network modeling, we systematically uncover the spatiotemporal dynamics and systemic drivers of ACEE. The results demonstrate that: Abdi (2010) (1) Total-factor efficiency evolved nonlinearly, and SDE tracking visualizes a spatial drag effect driven by the decline in resource efficiency in the mid-stream regions. Charnes et al. (1978) (2) The structural decomposition exposes a severe ecological asymmetry: while labor and machinery efficiencies improved rapidly due to technological substitution, fertilizer and irrigation efficiencies remained in a state of low-value lock-in. This reveals a critical “Masking Effect” in current agricultural transformations, where capital-driven data statistically conceals deep-seated resource intensity. Chen and Kou (2014) (3) PLS-R modeling identifies systemic spatial trade-offs: urbanization and the urban-rural income gap drive technological substitution, while spatial heterogeneity—manifested as land fragmentation in mountainous terrains—induces a “Scale Paradox” that hinders ecological economies of scale. This study provides a transferable data deconstruction and diagnostic protocol for evaluating multidimensional ecological performance in global agricultural basins. • Multi-dimensional decomposition unveils the “Masking Effect” in efficiency. • SDE trajectory tracking visualizes a “Spatial Drag” from resource inefficiency. • PLS-R modeling identifies systemic ecological trade-offs in complex networks. • Spatial heterogeneity analysis exposes a “Scale Paradox” in mountainous basins. • The integrated computational framework provides a transferable diagnostic protocol.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 186
Central South University of Forestry and Technology (CN), Central South University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.