Global survey of Flow Cytometry core facilities 2021

Two surveys were conducted of international core facilities that focused on Microscopy and Flow Cytometry for an in-depth snapshot of the landscape. Here we focus on the Flow Cytometry survey which had 148 respondents across 'The Americas', 'Asia Pacific' and 'Europe and Africa'. A variety of subjects were covered, including instrument types and quantities, staffing, fees and funding, and specific questions related to COVID response. Broadly, the global trends were similar but there were some geographical differences notably in staff to machine ratio and funding models. As this serves as a baseline for longitudinal studies, we will be able to use these data to follow trends across all metrics in the future as facilities and technologies evolve.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Microscopy
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.70094
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global survey of Flow Cytometry core facilities 2021

Derek Davies, Kirk J. Czymmek, Jessica B. Back, Peter O'Toole et al.
1 citations
Journal of Microscopy
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
11.68
article

Global survey of Flow Cytometry core facilities 2021

Derek Davies, Kirk J. Czymmek, Jessica B. Back, Peter O'Toole, Masilamani Elangovan, Alexander Scott, Zhenxi Guo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Two surveys were conducted of international core facilities that focused on Microscopy and Flow Cytometry for an in-depth snapshot of the landscape. Here we focus on the Flow Cytometry survey which had 148 respondents across 'The Americas', 'Asia Pacific' and 'Europe and Africa'. A variety of subjects were covered, including instrument types and quantities, staffing, fees and funding, and specific questions related to COVID response. Broadly, the global trends were similar but there were some geographical differences notably in staff to machine ratio and funding models. As this serves as a baseline for longitudinal studies, we will be able to use these data to follow trends across all metrics in the future as facilities and technologies evolve.

Journal of Microscopy
Wayne State University (US), Peking University (CN), Donald Danforth Plant Science Center (US), The Francis Crick Institute (GB), International Society of Exposure Science (US), University of York (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
11.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.