Cross wind safety – Relative criticality of line parts and potential identification of non-critical lines/parts

Cross wind safety considers the possibility of trains overturning in strong winds. Methods for detailed line assessments have been derived, initially for high speed lines, but in principle applicable to all lines. The probability to overturn in cross wind is in general dominated by few exposed parts of a line, typically embankments and bridges, possibly in combination with a curve. Depending on the approach, it can be useful to determine the relative criticality of different line parts to find the most exposed parts of a line. High speed lines are likely to have more and higher embankments and bridges than conventional lines, which can better follow the terrain. In addition, long term positive operational experience is mainly on conventional lines. Therefore, it can be relevant to allow a simpler assessment of conventional lines, to determine if they can be considered safe without a detailed quantitative assessment. This paper presents an approach to derive a relative critical wind speed that includes the effect of different aspects influencing the cross wind criticality of a line segment, which can be compared to other segments. A way to derive a threshold value of the relative critical wind speed is shown, where the threshold value defines the limit value for non-critical or safe parts of a line. It can further be used to derive maximum height of embankments and bridges that for given conditions are safe without further assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part F Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09544097261446023
Primary Topic
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross wind safety – Relative criticality of line parts and potential identification of non-critical lines/parts

Johan Haggstrom, Mikael Sima
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part F Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
article

Cross wind safety – Relative criticality of line parts and potential identification of non-critical lines/parts

Johan Haggstrom, Mikael Sima
article en

Abstract

Cross wind safety considers the possibility of trains overturning in strong winds. Methods for detailed line assessments have been derived, initially for high speed lines, but in principle applicable to all lines. The probability to overturn in cross wind is in general dominated by few exposed parts of a line, typically embankments and bridges, possibly in combination with a curve. Depending on the approach, it can be useful to determine the relative criticality of different line parts to find the most exposed parts of a line. High speed lines are likely to have more and higher embankments and bridges than conventional lines, which can better follow the terrain. In addition, long term positive operational experience is mainly on conventional lines. Therefore, it can be relevant to allow a simpler assessment of conventional lines, to determine if they can be considered safe without a detailed quantitative assessment. This paper presents an approach to derive a relative critical wind speed that includes the effect of different aspects influencing the cross wind criticality of a line segment, which can be compared to other segments. A way to derive a threshold value of the relative critical wind speed is shown, where the threshold value defines the limit value for non-critical or safe parts of a line. It can further be used to derive maximum height of embankments and bridges that for given conditions are safe without further assessment.

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part F Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
Swedish Transport Administration (SE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.