Training, Experiences and Factors Contributing to Learning Variability in Podiatry Residency and Fellowship Programs: A Systematic Review

Background/Objectives: Postgraduate training is an essential component for the development of professional skills in health sciences. Our research question was: How does the implementation of structured residency and fellowship programs in podiatry and foot and ankle surgery impact the acquisition of clinical and surgical skills, academic productivity, interprofessional integration, leadership development, and resident well-being compared to less structured or traditional programs? Methods: We conducted a systematic review of published research, between September and November 2025, selecting observational studies that evaluated structured training programs compared to traditional approaches. The studies included reported residency or fellowship programs in podiatry and foot and ankle surgery that described clinical, surgical or academic experiences, together with the factors that influence learning variability. Results: Eleven cross-sectional studies were included. Program structure, mentorship, clinical exposure, availability of educational resources, and individual motivation are determining factors in the variability of skills acquisition. Structured programs were associated with better academic and clinical performance, greater technical confidence, and professional leadership development. However, substantial heterogeneity was observed among programs, particularly regarding access to resources, which contributed to differences in the ultimate preparation of residents and fellows. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale adapted assessed methodological quality, showing a low-to-moderate risk of bias. Conclusions: The literature suggests that although the programs generally achieve basic training objectives, the standardization and implementation of structured educational strategies could optimize skills acquisition and reduce variability across programs. Furthermore, multicenter research incorporating objective outcome measures would facilitate the development of internationally applicable standards for evaluation in health education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14091165
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Training, Experiences and Factors Contributing to Learning Variability in Podiatry Residency and Fellowship Programs: A Systematic Review

Manuel Coheña‐Jiménez, José Algaba-Del-Castillo, Sergio Barrientos-Trigo, José Manuel Cuevas-Sánchez
Healthcare
Diversity and Career in Medicine
article

Training, Experiences and Factors Contributing to Learning Variability in Podiatry Residency and Fellowship Programs: A Systematic Review

Manuel Coheña‐Jiménez, José Algaba-Del-Castillo, Sergio Barrientos-Trigo, José Manuel Cuevas-Sánchez
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Postgraduate training is an essential component for the development of professional skills in health sciences. Our research question was: How does the implementation of structured residency and fellowship programs in podiatry and foot and ankle surgery impact the acquisition of clinical and surgical skills, academic productivity, interprofessional integration, leadership development, and resident well-being compared to less structured or traditional programs? Methods: We conducted a systematic review of published research, between September and November 2025, selecting observational studies that evaluated structured training programs compared to traditional approaches. The studies included reported residency or fellowship programs in podiatry and foot and ankle surgery that described clinical, surgical or academic experiences, together with the factors that influence learning variability. Results: Eleven cross-sectional studies were included. Program structure, mentorship, clinical exposure, availability of educational resources, and individual motivation are determining factors in the variability of skills acquisition. Structured programs were associated with better academic and clinical performance, greater technical confidence, and professional leadership development. However, substantial heterogeneity was observed among programs, particularly regarding access to resources, which contributed to differences in the ultimate preparation of residents and fellows. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale adapted assessed methodological quality, showing a low-to-moderate risk of bias. Conclusions: The literature suggests that although the programs generally achieve basic training objectives, the standardization and implementation of structured educational strategies could optimize skills acquisition and reduce variability across programs. Furthermore, multicenter research incorporating objective outcome measures would facilitate the development of internationally applicable standards for evaluation in health education.

HealthcareVol. 14(9)
Andalusian Health Service (ES), Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.