Assessing Risk for Bycatch and Byproduct Species Using a Modified Sustainability Assessment for Fishing Effects (SAFE) Approach

ABSTRACT Central to ecosystem‐based fisheries management is ensuring the sustainability of bycatch and byproduct species. However, the sustainability of these species is difficult to assess as the lack of information limits the use of traditional stock assessment methods. We demonstrate, using a complex multi‐species fisheries exemplar, the efficient assessment of large numbers of diverse species, using a modified Sustainability Assessment for Fishing Effects (SAFE) approach. Applying this technique to 256 teleost and elasmobranch species caught in Australia's Northern Territory Demersal and Timor Reef Fisheries, we first applied an initial screening assessment to identify at‐risk species followed by a secondary SAFE assessment for a more detailed evaluation. To enhance the precision of the secondary assessment, we incorporated species distribution modelling and refined fishing footprint estimates through spatial analysis of trawl paths, from vessel monitoring system data. Additionally, we integrated Monte Carlo simulations into the SAFE process to quantify uncertainties in fishing footprint and capture efficiency parameters. The conservative criteria applied in the initial screening process assessed 208 species as low‐risk, with the remaining 48 species evaluated through our modified secondary SAFE approach. These 48 species were also subsequently classified as low‐risk. Our approach adds steps to the SAFE process but enables us to efficiently assess large numbers of diverse species and thereby allows resources to be allocated to those species most at‐risk. This adaptable approach is readily modifiable for application in other fisheries, including those with no or limited effort and catch data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fish and Fisheries
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.70085
Primary Topic
Marine and fisheries research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Risk for Bycatch and Byproduct Species Using a Modified Sustainability Assessment for Fishing Effects (SAFE) Approach

Clive R. McMahon, Rik C. Buckworth, Vinay Udyawer, J. J. C. Smart et al.
Fish and Fisheries
Marine and fisheries research
article

Assessing Risk for Bycatch and Byproduct Species Using a Modified Sustainability Assessment for Fishing Effects (SAFE) Approach

Clive R. McMahon, Rik C. Buckworth, Vinay Udyawer, J. J. C. Smart, Grant Johnson, Chalie Huveneers
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Central to ecosystem‐based fisheries management is ensuring the sustainability of bycatch and byproduct species. However, the sustainability of these species is difficult to assess as the lack of information limits the use of traditional stock assessment methods. We demonstrate, using a complex multi‐species fisheries exemplar, the efficient assessment of large numbers of diverse species, using a modified Sustainability Assessment for Fishing Effects (SAFE) approach. Applying this technique to 256 teleost and elasmobranch species caught in Australia's Northern Territory Demersal and Timor Reef Fisheries, we first applied an initial screening assessment to identify at‐risk species followed by a secondary SAFE assessment for a more detailed evaluation. To enhance the precision of the secondary assessment, we incorporated species distribution modelling and refined fishing footprint estimates through spatial analysis of trawl paths, from vessel monitoring system data. Additionally, we integrated Monte Carlo simulations into the SAFE process to quantify uncertainties in fishing footprint and capture efficiency parameters. The conservative criteria applied in the initial screening process assessed 208 species as low‐risk, with the remaining 48 species evaluated through our modified secondary SAFE approach. These 48 species were also subsequently classified as low‐risk. Our approach adds steps to the SAFE process but enables us to efficiently assess large numbers of diverse species and thereby allows resources to be allocated to those species most at‐risk. This adaptable approach is readily modifiable for application in other fisheries, including those with no or limited effort and catch data.

Fish and Fisheries
Australian Institute of Marine Science (AU), Flinders University (AU), Mission Australia (AU), Charles Darwin University (AU), Sharks Pacific (CK), Sydney Institute of Marine Science (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU), James Cook University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Marine and fisheries research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.