Negotiating generative artificial intelligence in animal rights activism: A qualitative study in Türkiye

This phenomenological study examines how animal rights activists in Türkiye understand and engage with generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI). The research is based on semi-structured interviews with seventeen activists and ten months of digital observation. Thematic analysis generated three themes: ethical and value-based compatibility, practical applications in activism, and effectiveness and accessibility. Activists often relied on Gen AI to sustain campaign communication during periods of intensified mobilisation, while continuing to question its ethical compatibility and uneven accessibility. The study conceptualises activists’ engagement with Gen AI as an ongoing negotiation shaped by ethical concerns and practical demands. • Activists continue engaging with generative AI amid ethical tensions. • Anthropocentric defaults in Gen AI outputs conflict with anti -speciesist values. • Time pressure and accessibility sustain routinised Gen AI engagement. • Gen AI supports campaign content production and visual mobilisation. • Engagement unfolds as an ongoing ethical–practical negotiation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102843
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negotiating generative artificial intelligence in animal rights activism: A qualitative study in Türkiye

Şeyma Esin Erben
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Negotiating generative artificial intelligence in animal rights activism: A qualitative study in Türkiye

Şeyma Esin Erben
article en

Abstract

This phenomenological study examines how animal rights activists in Türkiye understand and engage with generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI). The research is based on semi-structured interviews with seventeen activists and ten months of digital observation. Thematic analysis generated three themes: ethical and value-based compatibility, practical applications in activism, and effectiveness and accessibility. Activists often relied on Gen AI to sustain campaign communication during periods of intensified mobilisation, while continuing to question its ethical compatibility and uneven accessibility. The study conceptualises activists’ engagement with Gen AI as an ongoing negotiation shaped by ethical concerns and practical demands. • Activists continue engaging with generative AI amid ethical tensions. • Anthropocentric defaults in Gen AI outputs conflict with anti -speciesist values. • Time pressure and accessibility sustain routinised Gen AI engagement. • Gen AI supports campaign content production and visual mobilisation. • Engagement unfolds as an ongoing ethical–practical negotiation.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 13
University of Malta (MT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.