Prevalence of diabetes distress and its association with medication adherence and diabetes control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Egypt and Jordan

This study aimed to examine the prevalence of diabetes distress and explore its potential impact on medication adherence and diabetes control. This cross-sectional clinical study was conducted among outpatients with type 2 diabetes in selected hospitals in Egypt and Jordan. The validated tools, the Diabetes Distress Scale (DSS), Self-Efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use (SEAMS), and the Malaysia Medication Adherence Assessment Tool (MyMAAT), were used for data collection. Descriptive and inferential statistics were employed as appropriate. This study included 475 participants, 56% from Egypt and 44% from Jordan. Among participants, 77.5% faced complications, and 45% exhibited uncontrolled HbA1c levels – a total of 29% and 40% experienced moderate and severe distress, respectively. The findings reveal a median total DSS score of 2.29 (IQR 1.41) on a scale of 1–6, with variations across subscales. Regimen distress had the highest score at 2.40 (IQR 1.60), followed by physician-related distress at 2.25 (IQR 1.75) and emotional distress at 2.20 (IQR 2.00). The interpersonal subscale recorded the lowest score at 2.00 (IQR 1.67). Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was employed to assess the relationship between diabetes distress and medication adherence. A significant negative correlation was observed (rs = −0.339, p < 0.001), indicating that higher levels of diabetes distress are associated with lower medication adherence. Our study explored the potential relationship between diabetes distress and HbA1c-based diabetes control. The Mann-Whitney U test (U = 20613, p = 0.004) revealed a significant difference in total Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS) scores between the two groups. The mean ranks indicate that DDS scores are notably higher in the uncontrolled group (206.97) compared to the controlled group (174.40). Diabetes-related distress appears to be widespread and is associated with various patient-related factors. This distress can significantly influence medication adherence and overall diabetes control. Strategies to enhance diabetes control should prioritise interventions that address key distress domains, particularly regimen and physician-related challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Public Health
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2026.2658905
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence of diabetes distress and its association with medication adherence and diabetes control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Egypt and Jordan

Mohamed Hassan Elnaem, Yasmeen Barakat, Khawla Abu Hammour, Rana Kamal Abu Farha et al.
Critical Public Health
Diabetes Management and Education
article

Prevalence of diabetes distress and its association with medication adherence and diabetes control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Egypt and Jordan

Mohamed Hassan Elnaem, Yasmeen Barakat, Khawla Abu Hammour, Rana Kamal Abu Farha, Merna Mahmoud Abou Khatwa, Muna Barakat
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the prevalence of diabetes distress and explore its potential impact on medication adherence and diabetes control. This cross-sectional clinical study was conducted among outpatients with type 2 diabetes in selected hospitals in Egypt and Jordan. The validated tools, the Diabetes Distress Scale (DSS), Self-Efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use (SEAMS), and the Malaysia Medication Adherence Assessment Tool (MyMAAT), were used for data collection. Descriptive and inferential statistics were employed as appropriate. This study included 475 participants, 56% from Egypt and 44% from Jordan. Among participants, 77.5% faced complications, and 45% exhibited uncontrolled HbA1c levels – a total of 29% and 40% experienced moderate and severe distress, respectively. The findings reveal a median total DSS score of 2.29 (IQR 1.41) on a scale of 1–6, with variations across subscales. Regimen distress had the highest score at 2.40 (IQR 1.60), followed by physician-related distress at 2.25 (IQR 1.75) and emotional distress at 2.20 (IQR 2.00). The interpersonal subscale recorded the lowest score at 2.00 (IQR 1.67). Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was employed to assess the relationship between diabetes distress and medication adherence. A significant negative correlation was observed (rs = −0.339, p < 0.001), indicating that higher levels of diabetes distress are associated with lower medication adherence. Our study explored the potential relationship between diabetes distress and HbA1c-based diabetes control. The Mann-Whitney U test (U = 20613, p = 0.004) revealed a significant difference in total Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS) scores between the two groups. The mean ranks indicate that DDS scores are notably higher in the uncontrolled group (206.97) compared to the controlled group (174.40). Diabetes-related distress appears to be widespread and is associated with various patient-related factors. This distress can significantly influence medication adherence and overall diabetes control. Strategies to enhance diabetes control should prioritise interventions that address key distress domains, particularly regimen and physician-related challenges.

Critical Public HealthVol. 36(1)
University of Jordan (JO), University of Ulster (GB), Applied Science Private University (JO), American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Diabetes Management and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.