Psychological Distress as a Predictor of Subsequent Loneliness Among Japanese University Students: A Cross-Lagged Analysis During the Post-COVID-19 Transition

Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic significantly affected university students' mental health, and loneliness is frequently cited as a key contributor to psychological distress. However, whether loneliness drives distress or distress generates loneliness remains unresolved. This study examined this question during the post-COVID-19 transition, when social opportunities had been restored, but psychological effects may have persisted. Methods A longitudinal web-based survey was conducted with Japanese university students at two time points: October 2022 (T1, during COVID-19 restrictions) and February 2024 (T2, post-restrictions). From 3,000 respondents at T1 and 3,075 at T2, 230 (7.7%; 95 male respondents, 135 female respondents; mean age = 20.3 years) completed both surveys. Cross-lagged regression analysis was used to examine the bidirectional relationships between the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) and UCLA Loneliness Scale (three-item version) scores. Results Loneliness decreased significantly from T1 to T2 (p = 0.017, d = 0.16), whereas distress did not. K6 scores at T1 predicted loneliness at T2 (β = 0.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.04, 0.28, p = 0.011), but loneliness at T1 did not predict K6 scores at T2 (β = 0.05, 95% CI = -0.06, 0.16, p = 0.333). An equality constraint test indicated that the difference between the two cross-lagged paths was not statistically significant (Δχ²(1) = 1.26, p = 0.263); therefore, the asymmetric pattern is suggestive of temporal precedence rather than confirmatory evidence of a unidirectional effect. T1 distress also predicted increased passive media consumption at T2; however, T1 behavioral changes did not predict T2 psychological outcomes, except that exercise was associated with lower subsequent distress. Conclusions These findings provide preliminary evidence that, over the 16-month period from October 2022 to February 2024, psychological distress is temporally associated with subsequent loneliness rather than the reverse. In this context, loneliness may partly represent a cognitive manifestation of underlying distress. Interventions for lonely university students would benefit from addressing underlying psychological distress, rather than focusing solely on increasing social connections.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.107845
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological Distress as a Predictor of Subsequent Loneliness Among Japanese University Students: A Cross-Lagged Analysis During the Post-COVID-19 Transition

Hiromu Nagaura, Atsuhiro Satsuma, Tetsuro Noda, Yoshinobu Fujita et al.
Cureus
COVID-19 and Mental Health
article

Psychological Distress as a Predictor of Subsequent Loneliness Among Japanese University Students: A Cross-Lagged Analysis During the Post-COVID-19 Transition

Hiromu Nagaura, Atsuhiro Satsuma, Tetsuro Noda, Yoshinobu Fujita, Yuko Taniya, Toshihiko Tsutsumi
article en

Abstract

Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic significantly affected university students' mental health, and loneliness is frequently cited as a key contributor to psychological distress. However, whether loneliness drives distress or distress generates loneliness remains unresolved. This study examined this question during the post-COVID-19 transition, when social opportunities had been restored, but psychological effects may have persisted. Methods A longitudinal web-based survey was conducted with Japanese university students at two time points: October 2022 (T1, during COVID-19 restrictions) and February 2024 (T2, post-restrictions). From 3,000 respondents at T1 and 3,075 at T2, 230 (7.7%; 95 male respondents, 135 female respondents; mean age = 20.3 years) completed both surveys. Cross-lagged regression analysis was used to examine the bidirectional relationships between the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) and UCLA Loneliness Scale (three-item version) scores. Results Loneliness decreased significantly from T1 to T2 (p = 0.017, d = 0.16), whereas distress did not. K6 scores at T1 predicted loneliness at T2 (β = 0.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.04, 0.28, p = 0.011), but loneliness at T1 did not predict K6 scores at T2 (β = 0.05, 95% CI = -0.06, 0.16, p = 0.333). An equality constraint test indicated that the difference between the two cross-lagged paths was not statistically significant (Δχ²(1) = 1.26, p = 0.263); therefore, the asymmetric pattern is suggestive of temporal precedence rather than confirmatory evidence of a unidirectional effect. T1 distress also predicted increased passive media consumption at T2; however, T1 behavioral changes did not predict T2 psychological outcomes, except that exercise was associated with lower subsequent distress. Conclusions These findings provide preliminary evidence that, over the 16-month period from October 2022 to February 2024, psychological distress is temporally associated with subsequent loneliness rather than the reverse. In this context, loneliness may partly represent a cognitive manifestation of underlying distress. Interventions for lonely university students would benefit from addressing underlying psychological distress, rather than focusing solely on increasing social connections.

Cureus
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.