SOFA-2 score predicts mortality in pneumonia-associated sepsis: a retrospective cohort study

Pneumonia is the leading cause of sepsis. This study aimed to compare the predictive accuracy for 28-day mortality between Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)-2 score and SOFA score in pneumonia-associated sepsis, and to develop and externally validate a composite model incorporating SOFA-2 with key clinical variables. This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from MIMIC-IV (n = 7,150) and externally validated using an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) cohort from Shandong Provincial Hospital (n = 301). Adults meeting Sepsis-3 criteria with pneumonia as the infection source were included. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. Multivariable Cox regression, time-dependent AUC analysis, and decision curve analysis were performed. The SOFA-2 composite model was developed and evaluated. In the MIMIC‑IV cohort, the 28‑day all-cause mortality was 28.1%. Multivariable analysis indicated that the SOFA‑2 score was an independent predictor of 28‑day mortality. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) curves of SOFA‑2 and SOFA overlapped substantially, with no significant difference in predictive performance (day 1: 0.78 vs. 0.79; day 28: 0.61 vs. 0.62). A composite SOFA‑2 model significantly improved predictive performance (day‑1 AUC = 0.87). MaxStat analysis identified an optimal risk‑stratification cutoff of 11 for SOFA‑2; patients in the high‑score group (> 11) had significantly lower 28‑day survival than those in the low‑score group (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the association between SOFA‑2 and prognosis remained consistent across different characteristic subgroups. External validation further confirmed the independent prognostic value and risk‑stratification ability of SOFA‑2. In patients with pneumonia‑associated sepsis, the SOFA‑2 score exhibited a predictive performance for 28‑day mortality risk similar to that of the conventional SOFA score. Although its standalone use did not show superiority, integrating SOFA‑2 with key clinical variables into a composite model significantly enhanced predictive accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-026-06027-4
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SOFA-2 score predicts mortality in pneumonia-associated sepsis: a retrospective cohort study

Yuezhi Zhu, Man Chen, Chenxi Li, Shuxing Wei et al.
Critical Care
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

SOFA-2 score predicts mortality in pneumonia-associated sepsis: a retrospective cohort study

Yuezhi Zhu, Man Chen, Chenxi Li, Shuxing Wei, Hongsheng Ren, Wei Fang, Wenqing Fan, Tianyu Wang
article en

Abstract

Pneumonia is the leading cause of sepsis. This study aimed to compare the predictive accuracy for 28-day mortality between Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)-2 score and SOFA score in pneumonia-associated sepsis, and to develop and externally validate a composite model incorporating SOFA-2 with key clinical variables. This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from MIMIC-IV (n = 7,150) and externally validated using an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) cohort from Shandong Provincial Hospital (n = 301). Adults meeting Sepsis-3 criteria with pneumonia as the infection source were included. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. Multivariable Cox regression, time-dependent AUC analysis, and decision curve analysis were performed. The SOFA-2 composite model was developed and evaluated. In the MIMIC‑IV cohort, the 28‑day all-cause mortality was 28.1%. Multivariable analysis indicated that the SOFA‑2 score was an independent predictor of 28‑day mortality. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) curves of SOFA‑2 and SOFA overlapped substantially, with no significant difference in predictive performance (day 1: 0.78 vs. 0.79; day 28: 0.61 vs. 0.62). A composite SOFA‑2 model significantly improved predictive performance (day‑1 AUC = 0.87). MaxStat analysis identified an optimal risk‑stratification cutoff of 11 for SOFA‑2; patients in the high‑score group (> 11) had significantly lower 28‑day survival than those in the low‑score group (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the association between SOFA‑2 and prognosis remained consistent across different characteristic subgroups. External validation further confirmed the independent prognostic value and risk‑stratification ability of SOFA‑2. In patients with pneumonia‑associated sepsis, the SOFA‑2 score exhibited a predictive performance for 28‑day mortality risk similar to that of the conventional SOFA score. Although its standalone use did not show superiority, integrating SOFA‑2 with key clinical variables into a composite model significantly enhanced predictive accuracy.

Critical Care
Shandong Provincial Hospital (CN), Heze Municipal Hospital (CN), Shandong First Medical University (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.