Patterns, predictors, and decision-support in antibiotic and analgesic use in endodontics: A cross-sectional survey

Abstract Introduction: In endodontics, antibiotics and analgesics are frequently prescribed, yet many prescriptions remain inappropriate, contributing to antimicrobial resistance, adverse drug events, and increased healthcare burden. Despite clear recommendations from the American Association of Endodontists (AAE), European Society of Endodontology, and American Dental Association (ADA), a knowledge–practice gap persists. Clinical decision-support systems (CDSS) may help standardize prescribing, but their role in endodontics remains underexplored. This study aimed to assess antibiotic and analgesic prescribing patterns among endodontic clinicians, evaluate adherence to stewardship guidelines, identify predictors of inappropriate prescribing, and explore the potential role of CDSS. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 385 participants (postgraduate students, academic faculty, and private practitioners) across India. A validated questionnaire collected demographic data, prescribing behavior in five structured clinical vignettes and perceptions of CDSS. Appropriateness was evaluated against AAE/ADA recommendations. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, and logistic regression. Results: Overall, 33.8% of prescriptions were inappropriate. Inappropriate prescribing was highest among postgraduate students (36.5%), followed by faculty (34.1%). Guideline awareness showed no significant association with appropriateness ( χ ² =0.27, P = 0.60). Logistic regression revealed no significant predictors, though postgraduate and faculty status showed nonsignificant higher odds of inappropriate prescribing. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were most commonly prescribed (54.5%), whereas 11.7% reported opioid use. Notably, 68.8% of respondents expressed support for CDSS integration. Conclusion: Inappropriate prescribing remains prevalent in endodontics, unaffected by guideline awareness or practice type. Persistent suboptimal analgesic patterns highlight the need for multifaceted stewardship interventions. Integration of CDSS, alongside education and system-level measures, may improve alignment with evidence-based practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Saudi Endodontic Journal
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_226_25
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patterns, predictors, and decision-support in antibiotic and analgesic use in endodontics: A cross-sectional survey

Pradeep Solete, Kavalipurapu Venkata Teja, T. Vigneshwar Sambandam, Saee Anawalikar et al.
Saudi Endodontic Journal
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

Patterns, predictors, and decision-support in antibiotic and analgesic use in endodontics: A cross-sectional survey

Pradeep Solete, Kavalipurapu Venkata Teja, T. Vigneshwar Sambandam, Saee Anawalikar, Sakshi Devendra Chandak
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: In endodontics, antibiotics and analgesics are frequently prescribed, yet many prescriptions remain inappropriate, contributing to antimicrobial resistance, adverse drug events, and increased healthcare burden. Despite clear recommendations from the American Association of Endodontists (AAE), European Society of Endodontology, and American Dental Association (ADA), a knowledge–practice gap persists. Clinical decision-support systems (CDSS) may help standardize prescribing, but their role in endodontics remains underexplored. This study aimed to assess antibiotic and analgesic prescribing patterns among endodontic clinicians, evaluate adherence to stewardship guidelines, identify predictors of inappropriate prescribing, and explore the potential role of CDSS. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 385 participants (postgraduate students, academic faculty, and private practitioners) across India. A validated questionnaire collected demographic data, prescribing behavior in five structured clinical vignettes and perceptions of CDSS. Appropriateness was evaluated against AAE/ADA recommendations. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, and logistic regression. Results: Overall, 33.8% of prescriptions were inappropriate. Inappropriate prescribing was highest among postgraduate students (36.5%), followed by faculty (34.1%). Guideline awareness showed no significant association with appropriateness ( χ ² =0.27, P = 0.60). Logistic regression revealed no significant predictors, though postgraduate and faculty status showed nonsignificant higher odds of inappropriate prescribing. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were most commonly prescribed (54.5%), whereas 11.7% reported opioid use. Notably, 68.8% of respondents expressed support for CDSS integration. Conclusion: Inappropriate prescribing remains prevalent in endodontics, unaffected by guideline awareness or practice type. Persistent suboptimal analgesic patterns highlight the need for multifaceted stewardship interventions. Integration of CDSS, alongside education and system-level measures, may improve alignment with evidence-based practice.

Saudi Endodontic JournalVol. 16(2)
G Pulla Reddy Dental College & Hospital (IN), Saveetha University (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.