The Mass-Energy-Information Equivalence: A bottom-up identification of the particle spectrum via FCC lattice error correction

Does information possess physical mass? Modelling the physical vacuum as a substrate-free quantum error-correcting code suggests that an elementary particle’s mass is simply its fault-tolerant verification cost. We test this Mass-Energy-Information (M/E/I) equivalence on the Face-Centred Cubic (FCC) lattice, tracking defects within a [ [ 192 , 130 , 3 ] ] CSS code. Through a bottom-up classification of all possible defect geometries, we filter 25 candidate states through four strict thermodynamic and topological axioms — Minimum Topological Dimension, Sector Completeness, Boundary Closure, and Kinematic Shedding — each derived from established QEC theory or lattice gauge theory. Exactly 5 physically stable states survive this sieve. Their verification costs — 1, 207, 273, 1836, and 1839 — match the empirical mass ratios of the electron, muon, pion, proton, and neutron to within 0.12%. The rejected configurations violate specific physical constraints and match no known particles. No parameters are fitted. This offers highly constrained macroscopic evidence that inertial rest mass is the thermodynamic shadow of quantum error correction overhead.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics Open
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physo.2026.100414
Primary Topic
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Mass-Energy-Information Equivalence: A bottom-up identification of the particle spectrum via FCC lattice error correction

Raghu Kulkarni
Physics Open
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
article

The Mass-Energy-Information Equivalence: A bottom-up identification of the particle spectrum via FCC lattice error correction

Raghu Kulkarni
article en

Abstract

Does information possess physical mass? Modelling the physical vacuum as a substrate-free quantum error-correcting code suggests that an elementary particle’s mass is simply its fault-tolerant verification cost. We test this Mass-Energy-Information (M/E/I) equivalence on the Face-Centred Cubic (FCC) lattice, tracking defects within a [ [ 192 , 130 , 3 ] ] CSS code. Through a bottom-up classification of all possible defect geometries, we filter 25 candidate states through four strict thermodynamic and topological axioms — Minimum Topological Dimension, Sector Completeness, Boundary Closure, and Kinematic Shedding — each derived from established QEC theory or lattice gauge theory. Exactly 5 physically stable states survive this sieve. Their verification costs — 1, 207, 273, 1836, and 1839 — match the empirical mass ratios of the electron, muon, pion, proton, and neutron to within 0.12%. The rejected configurations violate specific physical constraints and match no known particles. No parameters are fitted. This offers highly constrained macroscopic evidence that inertial rest mass is the thermodynamic shadow of quantum error correction overhead.

Physics OpenVol. 27
IDEO (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.