Blood‐Based Circulating Tumor <scp>DNA</scp> Assays for Early Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review of Performance in Asymptomatic Screening Populations

Early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) via population-based screening programs can reduce incidence and mortality. Current screening approaches are limited by cost, accessibility, compliance, and colonoscopy capacity. Blood-based screening of circulating tumor (ct) DNA may resolve some of these limitations. This systematic review evaluated the screening potential of blood-based ctDNA assays in asymptomatic screening populations. We systematically searched the PubMed database (final search June 20th, 2025) for studies detecting advanced adenomas (AAs) or CRC in asymptomatic cohorts, where a blood-based ctDNA assay had been evaluated with data on specificity, sensitivity, and/or AUC at early stages of disease. Newcastle-Ottowa scale was used for quality assessment. Only 20 studies of 454 unique hits met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 12 studies used assays targeting specific DNA alterations, while the remaining 8 studies used complex assays. Generally, comprehensive assays such as Shield, ColonSecure, and FMBT-CRC had the best performance for early-stage CRC detection with sensitivities of 71%-85% and specificities of 88%-90%. Despite being tested in a small cohort, the Coloscape assay was the only assay to reach sufficient AA detection with 59% sensitivity and 92% specificity. None of the reviewed ctDNA assays demonstrated sufficient sensitivities for both AA and early-stage CRC detection to be considered future screening tools. Screening tools based on ctDNA assays have not proved superior to fecal-based immunochemical test (FIT) yet. Future studies need to test ctDNA screening tools in large, prospective, asymptomatic cohorts emphasizing AA, and early-stage CRC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Cancer
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70498
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blood‐Based Circulating Tumor DNA Assays for Early Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review of Performance in Asymptomatic Screening Populations

Inge Søkilde Pedersen, Jakob Kleif, Christina Therkildsen, Maria Rasmussen et al.
International Journal of Cancer
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
article

Blood‐Based Circulating Tumor DNA Assays for Early Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review of Performance in Asymptomatic Screening Populations

Inge Søkilde Pedersen, Jakob Kleif, Christina Therkildsen, Maria Rasmussen, Caroline Ledertoug Kahn
article en

Abstract

Early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) via population-based screening programs can reduce incidence and mortality. Current screening approaches are limited by cost, accessibility, compliance, and colonoscopy capacity. Blood-based screening of circulating tumor (ct) DNA may resolve some of these limitations. This systematic review evaluated the screening potential of blood-based ctDNA assays in asymptomatic screening populations. We systematically searched the PubMed database (final search June 20th, 2025) for studies detecting advanced adenomas (AAs) or CRC in asymptomatic cohorts, where a blood-based ctDNA assay had been evaluated with data on specificity, sensitivity, and/or AUC at early stages of disease. Newcastle-Ottowa scale was used for quality assessment. Only 20 studies of 454 unique hits met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 12 studies used assays targeting specific DNA alterations, while the remaining 8 studies used complex assays. Generally, comprehensive assays such as Shield, ColonSecure, and FMBT-CRC had the best performance for early-stage CRC detection with sensitivities of 71%-85% and specificities of 88%-90%. Despite being tested in a small cohort, the Coloscape assay was the only assay to reach sufficient AA detection with 59% sensitivity and 92% specificity. None of the reviewed ctDNA assays demonstrated sufficient sensitivities for both AA and early-stage CRC detection to be considered future screening tools. Screening tools based on ctDNA assays have not proved superior to fecal-based immunochemical test (FIT) yet. Future studies need to test ctDNA screening tools in large, prospective, asymptomatic cohorts emphasizing AA, and early-stage CRC.

International Journal of Cancer
University of Copenhagen (DK), Aalborg University Hospital (DK), Hvidovre Hospital (DK), North Denmark Region (DK), Aalborg University (DK)
Kræftens Bekæmpelse, Harboefonden
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.