Faith in a God without Contours?

Abstract This article investigates a tension within Wolfhart Pannenberg’s theology that becomes visible when his account of faith as trust is considered alongside his doctrine of God. On the one hand, Pannenberg argues that Christian faith, understood as trust (fiducia) , presupposes that God himself can meaningfully be regarded as trustworthy. On the other hand, his early reflections on religious language suggest that all talk about God is equivocal. If this is the case, then the conceptual contours of God seem to recede precisely at the point where faith appears to presuppose them. The article first reconstructs these two lines of argument and identifies the point at which they come into conflict. It then examines whether anthropological and hermeneutical considerations within Pannenberg’s own thought mitigate this tension. Finally, it argues that Pannenberg’s later theology allows for a more cataphatic understanding of God that is better able to support the logic of Christian trust.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/nzsth-2026-0008
Primary Topic
Karl Barth and Christian Theology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Faith in a God without Contours?

Dr. Matthias Ruf
Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie
Karl Barth and Christian Theology
article

Faith in a God without Contours?

Dr. Matthias Ruf
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article investigates a tension within Wolfhart Pannenberg’s theology that becomes visible when his account of faith as trust is considered alongside his doctrine of God. On the one hand, Pannenberg argues that Christian faith, understood as trust (fiducia) , presupposes that God himself can meaningfully be regarded as trustworthy. On the other hand, his early reflections on religious language suggest that all talk about God is equivocal. If this is the case, then the conceptual contours of God seem to recede precisely at the point where faith appears to presuppose them. The article first reconstructs these two lines of argument and identifies the point at which they come into conflict. It then examines whether anthropological and hermeneutical considerations within Pannenberg’s own thought mitigate this tension. Finally, it argues that Pannenberg’s later theology allows for a more cataphatic understanding of God that is better able to support the logic of Christian trust.

Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie
University of Tübingen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Karl Barth and Christian Theology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.