Failure Patterns of Severely Compromised Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth: A Comparative In Vitro Study of Two Restorative Approaches

Introduction This in vitro study aimed to compare the failure patterns of two restorative techniques in severely damaged, endodontically treated maxillary central incisors: (1) endocrowns fabricated from lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS e.max Press), and (2) quartz-fiber posts with composite resin cores and lithium disilicate crowns (IPS e.max Press). Materials and Methods Twenty freshly extracted human maxillary central incisors with intact roots, comparable in length, morphology, and size, were selected. The teeth were randomly allocated into two groups (n = 10): Group I, restored with lithium disilicate endocrowns (IPS e.max Press), and Group II, restored with quartz-fiber posts, composite resin cores, and lithium disilicate crowns (IPS e.max Press). Specimens were mounted and tested using a universal testing machine. A compressive load was applied at a 45° angle to the middle third of the palatal surface at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until failure occurred. Failure patterns were recorded and analyzed using SPSS software (version 13). Results Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in the distribution of failure patterns between the two groups ( p > 0.05, 95% confidence level). Discussion This study compared endocrowns and post-and-core restorations for endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. Both techniques showed comparable fracture resistance, with failure modes differing mainly in location and repairability. Endocrowns demonstrated favorable outcomes due to their minimally invasive design and improved stress distribution. These findings support endocrowns as a conservative alternative while confirming that both approaches can provide clinically acceptable performance. Conclusion Within the limitations of this in vitro study, endocrowns fabricated from lithium disilicate (IPS e.max Press) exhibited failure patterns comparable to those of the conventional technique involving quartz-fiber posts, composite cores, and lithium disilicate crowns when restoring severely compromised endodontically treated anterior teeth.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Open Dentistry Journal
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2174/0118742106440539260407102718
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Failure Patterns of Severely Compromised Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth: A Comparative In Vitro Study of Two Restorative Approaches

Ziad Albash, Rima Saker, Abed Alhade Kheder
The Open Dentistry Journal
Dental materials and restorations
article

Failure Patterns of Severely Compromised Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth: A Comparative In Vitro Study of Two Restorative Approaches

Ziad Albash, Rima Saker, Abed Alhade Kheder
article en

Abstract

Introduction This in vitro study aimed to compare the failure patterns of two restorative techniques in severely damaged, endodontically treated maxillary central incisors: (1) endocrowns fabricated from lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS e.max Press), and (2) quartz-fiber posts with composite resin cores and lithium disilicate crowns (IPS e.max Press). Materials and Methods Twenty freshly extracted human maxillary central incisors with intact roots, comparable in length, morphology, and size, were selected. The teeth were randomly allocated into two groups (n = 10): Group I, restored with lithium disilicate endocrowns (IPS e.max Press), and Group II, restored with quartz-fiber posts, composite resin cores, and lithium disilicate crowns (IPS e.max Press). Specimens were mounted and tested using a universal testing machine. A compressive load was applied at a 45° angle to the middle third of the palatal surface at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until failure occurred. Failure patterns were recorded and analyzed using SPSS software (version 13). Results Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in the distribution of failure patterns between the two groups ( p > 0.05, 95% confidence level). Discussion This study compared endocrowns and post-and-core restorations for endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. Both techniques showed comparable fracture resistance, with failure modes differing mainly in location and repairability. Endocrowns demonstrated favorable outcomes due to their minimally invasive design and improved stress distribution. These findings support endocrowns as a conservative alternative while confirming that both approaches can provide clinically acceptable performance. Conclusion Within the limitations of this in vitro study, endocrowns fabricated from lithium disilicate (IPS e.max Press) exhibited failure patterns comparable to those of the conventional technique involving quartz-fiber posts, composite cores, and lithium disilicate crowns when restoring severely compromised endodontically treated anterior teeth.

The Open Dentistry JournalVol. 20(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.