Efficacy of Exercise‐Based Interventions for Metabolic Syndrome: An Umbrella Review With Meta‐Analyses

BACKGROUND: Regular exercise is a first-line nonpharmacological strategy for managing metabolic syndrome (MetS), but varied exercise modalities and outcomes across studies have led to inconsistent findings that limit clinical guidance. OBJECTIVE: To synthesize up-to-date evidence on the efficacy of exercise-based interventions in improving MetS components and cardiometabolic health in individuals with MetS. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews guideline, we searched seven databases from inception to May 2025 for systematic reviews with meta-analyses evaluating various types of exercise-based interventions (aerobic, aerobic, high-intensity interval training [HIIT], resistance, mind-body, and combined aerobic and resistance training). [Correction added on 1 May 2026, after first online publication: The previous sentence has been corrected in this version.] Outcomes included MetS components-waist circumference (WC), systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG), and fasting blood glucose (FBG)-along with other clinically relevant cardiometabolic parameters. RESULTS: Twelve systematic reviews with meta-analyses, representing 122 primary studies (9639 participants), were included. Overall, exercise-based interventions significantly improved all MetS components and secondary cardiometabolic outcomes (all p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed aerobic and mind-body exercises improved all MetS components, whereas resistance, HIIT, and combined training enhanced specific components. Compared to usual care, combined training elicited larger effects on reducing FBG (-0.73 mmol/L, 95% CI: -1.43 to -0.02), TG (-0.26 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.48 to -0.05), SBP (-4.25 mmHg, 95% CI: -7.16 to -1.34), and DBP (-3.69 mmHg, 95% CI: -5.18 to -2.20) than aerobic or resistance exercise alone. CONCLUSION: This umbrella review represents the largest evaluation specific to patients with MetS to date, indicating that exercise-based interventions, across various modalities, significantly improve MetS components. The findings underscore the versatility of exercise, supporting tailored, patient-centered prescriptions for managing MetS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obesity Reviews
Published
2026-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.70144
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of Exercise‐Based Interventions for Metabolic Syndrome: An Umbrella Review With Meta‐Analyses

Jonathan P. Little, Angelo Sabag, Hong‐Yat Li, Eric Tsz‐Chun Poon et al.
Obesity Reviews
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Efficacy of Exercise‐Based Interventions for Metabolic Syndrome: An Umbrella Review With Meta‐Analyses

Jonathan P. Little, Angelo Sabag, Hong‐Yat Li, Eric Tsz‐Chun Poon, Wesley Man-Kuk Sum, Po-San Wong
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Regular exercise is a first-line nonpharmacological strategy for managing metabolic syndrome (MetS), but varied exercise modalities and outcomes across studies have led to inconsistent findings that limit clinical guidance. OBJECTIVE: To synthesize up-to-date evidence on the efficacy of exercise-based interventions in improving MetS components and cardiometabolic health in individuals with MetS. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews guideline, we searched seven databases from inception to May 2025 for systematic reviews with meta-analyses evaluating various types of exercise-based interventions (aerobic, aerobic, high-intensity interval training [HIIT], resistance, mind-body, and combined aerobic and resistance training). [Correction added on 1 May 2026, after first online publication: The previous sentence has been corrected in this version.] Outcomes included MetS components-waist circumference (WC), systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG), and fasting blood glucose (FBG)-along with other clinically relevant cardiometabolic parameters. RESULTS: Twelve systematic reviews with meta-analyses, representing 122 primary studies (9639 participants), were included. Overall, exercise-based interventions significantly improved all MetS components and secondary cardiometabolic outcomes (all p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed aerobic and mind-body exercises improved all MetS components, whereas resistance, HIIT, and combined training enhanced specific components. Compared to usual care, combined training elicited larger effects on reducing FBG (-0.73 mmol/L, 95% CI: -1.43 to -0.02), TG (-0.26 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.48 to -0.05), SBP (-4.25 mmHg, 95% CI: -7.16 to -1.34), and DBP (-3.69 mmHg, 95% CI: -5.18 to -2.20) than aerobic or resistance exercise alone. CONCLUSION: This umbrella review represents the largest evaluation specific to patients with MetS to date, indicating that exercise-based interventions, across various modalities, significantly improve MetS components. The findings underscore the versatility of exercise, supporting tailored, patient-centered prescriptions for managing MetS.

Obesity Reviews
The University of Sydney (AU), University of British Columbia (CA), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.