Evaluating Energy Absorption Performance of Filled Lattice Structures

Filling the voids of lattice structures with a second material is known to increase energy absorption capacity, but the practical performance benefit is hard to quantify when the maximum stress also rises. In this article, we introduce a new metric, the energy absorption performance index (EAPI), that combines energy absorption, mass, and maximum stress into a single scalar value, enabling us to assess the true utility of filled lattices relative to single‐material lattices. The principles that define EAPI are first established by analyzing a dataset of over 170 absorber compression tests, which show that it captures the most relevant aspects of design, making it suitable for evaluating new design concepts such as filled lattices. A finite element study is then performed to understand which filled lattice architecture/material combinations lead to improved performance according to the EAPI metric. Three representative lattice unit cells (octet, rhombic dodecahedron, and body‐centered‐cubic with z orientation) and three representative filler materials (low‐density polyethylene, silicone rubber, polystyrene foam) are considered in the analysis. The results show that fillers typically reduce performance, and that only marginal improvements are possible in lattices prone to buckling, combined with high‐performance (high EAPI) fillers. The same trends are observed when the EAPI metric is applied to analyze prior experimental studies comparing filled and empty energy‐absorbing structures. The results of this work have significant implications for the design selection of energy absorbers and for future research aimed at achieving improved energy absorption performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Engineering Materials
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202502835
Primary Topic
Cellular and Composite Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Energy Absorption Performance of Filled Lattice Structures

Iwona Jasiuk, William P. King, Christian Bonney
Advanced Engineering Materials
Cellular and Composite Structures
article

Evaluating Energy Absorption Performance of Filled Lattice Structures

Iwona Jasiuk, William P. King, Christian Bonney
article en

Abstract

Filling the voids of lattice structures with a second material is known to increase energy absorption capacity, but the practical performance benefit is hard to quantify when the maximum stress also rises. In this article, we introduce a new metric, the energy absorption performance index (EAPI), that combines energy absorption, mass, and maximum stress into a single scalar value, enabling us to assess the true utility of filled lattices relative to single‐material lattices. The principles that define EAPI are first established by analyzing a dataset of over 170 absorber compression tests, which show that it captures the most relevant aspects of design, making it suitable for evaluating new design concepts such as filled lattices. A finite element study is then performed to understand which filled lattice architecture/material combinations lead to improved performance according to the EAPI metric. Three representative lattice unit cells (octet, rhombic dodecahedron, and body‐centered‐cubic with z orientation) and three representative filler materials (low‐density polyethylene, silicone rubber, polystyrene foam) are considered in the analysis. The results show that fillers typically reduce performance, and that only marginal improvements are possible in lattices prone to buckling, combined with high‐performance (high EAPI) fillers. The same trends are observed when the EAPI metric is applied to analyze prior experimental studies comparing filled and empty energy‐absorbing structures. The results of this work have significant implications for the design selection of energy absorbers and for future research aimed at achieving improved energy absorption performance.

Advanced Engineering Materials
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Army Research Laboratory
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cellular and Composite Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.