Clinical and radiographic factors associated with failure of endodontically treated teeth: A cross-sectional study

Abstract Introduction: Despite high reported success rates for endodontic treatment, failures remain a common clinical challenge. Identifying the contributing factors to such failures is critical to improving long-term treatment outcomes. This study aimed to determine the clinical and radiographic causes of failure in endodontically treated teeth and analyze their association with tooth type, quality of obturation, coronal restoration status, and other procedural factors. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study included 117 patients presenting with 145 failed endodontically treated teeth. After obtaining ethical clearance and informed consent, each case was assessed using clinical examination and standardized periapical radiographs. Data regarding tooth type, gender, quality of root canal obturation, coronal restoration, and reasons for failure were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the distribution and frequency of failure-related variables. Results: Endodontic factors alone accounted for 40.68% of failures, followed by combined endodontic and restorative factors (31.03%) and restorative factors alone (28.27%). Maxillary molars were the most frequently affected teeth (47.58%). The most common radiographic defect was underfilled canals (41.37%), followed by poorly filled (24.82%) and missed canals (22.06%). Regarding coronal restorations, 22.06% of failed teeth had no restoration, while 24.82% had full-coverage crowns. Among extracted teeth, 48.27% failed due to restorative reasons. Overall, 80% of teeth were referred for retreatment, and 20% were extracted. Conclusion: The majority of failures were associated with technical deficiencies, primarily related to inadequate obturation (endodontic factors) and coronal restoration quality, highlighting the importance of strict adherence to clinical protocols.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Saudi Endodontic Journal
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_224_25
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical and radiographic factors associated with failure of endodontically treated teeth: A cross-sectional study

Anamika Borkar, Sanket Aras, Anita Tandale, Shalini D. Aggarwal
Saudi Endodontic Journal
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Clinical and radiographic factors associated with failure of endodontically treated teeth: A cross-sectional study

Anamika Borkar, Sanket Aras, Anita Tandale, Shalini D. Aggarwal
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Despite high reported success rates for endodontic treatment, failures remain a common clinical challenge. Identifying the contributing factors to such failures is critical to improving long-term treatment outcomes. This study aimed to determine the clinical and radiographic causes of failure in endodontically treated teeth and analyze their association with tooth type, quality of obturation, coronal restoration status, and other procedural factors. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study included 117 patients presenting with 145 failed endodontically treated teeth. After obtaining ethical clearance and informed consent, each case was assessed using clinical examination and standardized periapical radiographs. Data regarding tooth type, gender, quality of root canal obturation, coronal restoration, and reasons for failure were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the distribution and frequency of failure-related variables. Results: Endodontic factors alone accounted for 40.68% of failures, followed by combined endodontic and restorative factors (31.03%) and restorative factors alone (28.27%). Maxillary molars were the most frequently affected teeth (47.58%). The most common radiographic defect was underfilled canals (41.37%), followed by poorly filled (24.82%) and missed canals (22.06%). Regarding coronal restorations, 22.06% of failed teeth had no restoration, while 24.82% had full-coverage crowns. Among extracted teeth, 48.27% failed due to restorative reasons. Overall, 80% of teeth were referred for retreatment, and 20% were extracted. Conclusion: The majority of failures were associated with technical deficiencies, primarily related to inadequate obturation (endodontic factors) and coronal restoration quality, highlighting the importance of strict adherence to clinical protocols.

Saudi Endodontic JournalVol. 16(2)
Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune (IN), Dr D Y Patil Dental College & Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.