The paradoxes of generative AI-mediated acculturation

Purpose This paper examines how generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is transforming cross-cultural consumer engagement by reshaping how people encounter, learn and perform culture. We conceptualize GenAI as a cultural intermediary that enables “model-mediated contact,” extending acculturation theory beyond both direct and media-mediated forms of cultural learning to explain how algorithmic systems reshape cultural exposure, identity formation and adaptation in international marketing contexts. Design/methodology/approach We integrate acculturation theory, affordance theory and research on global consumer culture to build a conceptual framework linking four GenAI affordances – translation and localization, synthesis, role-play and simulation and conversational memory – to four mechanisms that shape AI-mediated cultural learning: secondhand acculturation, algorithmic cosmopolitanism, curated curiosity and the control illusion. The framework patterned tensions and trade-offs that affect both consumers and marketers, which we theorize as paradoxes rather than linear effects. Findings GenAI broadens cultural access but compresses nuance. It enables surface fluency while weakening pragmatic competence and authenticity. The four mechanisms reveal how algorithmic mediation fosters breadth over depth, legibility over meaning and efficiency over originality. These dynamics generate four paradoxes: Understanding–Authenticity, Connection–Resonance, Choice–Creativity and Democratization–Dominance. Together, they show how greater technological reach can simultaneously erode cultural richness, symbolic depth and brand distinctiveness. Originality/value This paper advances international marketing theory by introducing model-mediated acculturation and distinguishing algorithmic cosmopolitanism from experiential cosmopolitanism. It redefines consumer agency as interactive in form but bounded in substance and calls for updated frameworks that reflect GenAI's role in shaping cultural contact, authenticity and identity. It further specifies how GenAI-mediated acculturation reshapes core international marketing constructs, including brand authenticity, legitimacy, consumer–brand identification, perceived cultural distance and standardization–adaptation dynamics. For managers, it offers diagnostic guidance on preserving cultural depth, balancing AI and human mediation, redesigning journeys for model-shaped discovery and protecting provenance in a GenAI-driven marketplace.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Marketing Review
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/imr-10-2025-0569
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The paradoxes of generative AI-mediated acculturation

Alexis Mavrommatis, Sean Sands, Colin Campbell
International Marketing Review
AI in Service Interactions
article

The paradoxes of generative AI-mediated acculturation

Alexis Mavrommatis, Sean Sands, Colin Campbell
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper examines how generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is transforming cross-cultural consumer engagement by reshaping how people encounter, learn and perform culture. We conceptualize GenAI as a cultural intermediary that enables “model-mediated contact,” extending acculturation theory beyond both direct and media-mediated forms of cultural learning to explain how algorithmic systems reshape cultural exposure, identity formation and adaptation in international marketing contexts. Design/methodology/approach We integrate acculturation theory, affordance theory and research on global consumer culture to build a conceptual framework linking four GenAI affordances – translation and localization, synthesis, role-play and simulation and conversational memory – to four mechanisms that shape AI-mediated cultural learning: secondhand acculturation, algorithmic cosmopolitanism, curated curiosity and the control illusion. The framework patterned tensions and trade-offs that affect both consumers and marketers, which we theorize as paradoxes rather than linear effects. Findings GenAI broadens cultural access but compresses nuance. It enables surface fluency while weakening pragmatic competence and authenticity. The four mechanisms reveal how algorithmic mediation fosters breadth over depth, legibility over meaning and efficiency over originality. These dynamics generate four paradoxes: Understanding–Authenticity, Connection–Resonance, Choice–Creativity and Democratization–Dominance. Together, they show how greater technological reach can simultaneously erode cultural richness, symbolic depth and brand distinctiveness. Originality/value This paper advances international marketing theory by introducing model-mediated acculturation and distinguishing algorithmic cosmopolitanism from experiential cosmopolitanism. It redefines consumer agency as interactive in form but bounded in substance and calls for updated frameworks that reflect GenAI's role in shaping cultural contact, authenticity and identity. It further specifies how GenAI-mediated acculturation reshapes core international marketing constructs, including brand authenticity, legitimacy, consumer–brand identification, perceived cultural distance and standardization–adaptation dynamics. For managers, it offers diagnostic guidance on preserving cultural depth, balancing AI and human mediation, redesigning journeys for model-shaped discovery and protecting provenance in a GenAI-driven marketplace.

International Marketing Review
University of San Diego (US), Universitat Ramon Llull (ES), Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.