The Effect of Adhesive Procedures on the Repair Bond Strength of Aged Universal Composites

Background: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the repair bond strength of aged universal composites after surface treatment and different adhesive applications.Methods: Three universal composites (GC Achord, Filtek Ultimate, Clearfil Majesty) were used to prepare 315 specimens (n=105 per composite). Seven groups were created: a negative control (NC) (only polished), a positive control (PC) (bur–roughened-only) and five experimental groups in which roughened surfaces were treated with G2-Bond Universal (G2), Prime&Bond Universal (PB), Clearfil SE Bond (SE), the hydrophobic bond of G2 (G2B), the hydrophobic bond of SE (SEB). Repair restorations were completed using Nova Compo HS. Shear bond strength was measured at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min, and values were recorded in MPa. Fracture modes were classified as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test (p

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Selcuk Dental Journal
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1843999
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Adhesive Procedures on the Repair Bond Strength of Aged Universal Composites

Merve Gürses, Mehmet Semih VELİOĞLU, Fatma SAĞ GÜNGÖR, Sinem Özdemir et al.
Selcuk Dental Journal
Dental materials and restorations
article

The Effect of Adhesive Procedures on the Repair Bond Strength of Aged Universal Composites

Merve Gürses, Mehmet Semih VELİOĞLU, Fatma SAĞ GÜNGÖR, Sinem Özdemir, Nimet Ünlü, Atiye Tuğba Kuzgun Türkmen
article en

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the repair bond strength of aged universal composites after surface treatment and different adhesive applications.Methods: Three universal composites (GC Achord, Filtek Ultimate, Clearfil Majesty) were used to prepare 315 specimens (n=105 per composite). Seven groups were created: a negative control (NC) (only polished), a positive control (PC) (bur–roughened-only) and five experimental groups in which roughened surfaces were treated with G2-Bond Universal (G2), Prime&Bond Universal (PB), Clearfil SE Bond (SE), the hydrophobic bond of G2 (G2B), the hydrophobic bond of SE (SEB). Repair restorations were completed using Nova Compo HS. Shear bond strength was measured at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min, and values were recorded in MPa. Fracture modes were classified as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test (p

Selcuk Dental JournalVol. 13(1)
Selçuk University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.