Rethinking ‘Strengths’ in Youth Health Research

The language of 'strengths' and 'strengths-based approaches' has rapidly grown in health research, yet rarely have these approaches been evaluated for their conceptual adequacy. This paper presents an analysis of recent literature to examine how young people's 'strengths' have been represented. We found that most papers use the language of resilience and protective factors to focus mostly on individual traits or attributes. This literature offers limited, if any, understanding of how 'strengths' are produced, being concerned instead with describing and classifying individual traits. A smaller group of studies has used concepts of capital to frame strengths in relation to the durability and quality of relationships. Our analysis suggests that this relational understanding of 'strengths' opens up more productive conceptual space for policies and programmes to intervene not with individuals but with social relations: the practices, identities and collective knowledges that produce and sustain young people's positive trajectories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology of Health & Illness
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.70189
Primary Topic
Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking ‘Strengths’ in Youth Health Research

Reuben Bolt, Megan Blaxland, Ayusha Bajracharya, Joanne Bryant et al.
Sociology of Health & Illness
Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
article

Rethinking ‘Strengths’ in Youth Health Research

Reuben Bolt, Megan Blaxland, Ayusha Bajracharya, Joanne Bryant, Peter Aggleton, Chelsea van Deventer
article en

Abstract

The language of 'strengths' and 'strengths-based approaches' has rapidly grown in health research, yet rarely have these approaches been evaluated for their conceptual adequacy. This paper presents an analysis of recent literature to examine how young people's 'strengths' have been represented. We found that most papers use the language of resilience and protective factors to focus mostly on individual traits or attributes. This literature offers limited, if any, understanding of how 'strengths' are produced, being concerned instead with describing and classifying individual traits. A smaller group of studies has used concepts of capital to frame strengths in relation to the durability and quality of relationships. Our analysis suggests that this relational understanding of 'strengths' opens up more productive conceptual space for policies and programmes to intervene not with individuals but with social relations: the practices, identities and collective knowledges that produce and sustain young people's positive trajectories.

Sociology of Health & IllnessVol. 48(4)
Australian National University (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), The George Institute for Global Health (GB), UNSW Sydney (AU), University College London (GB)
Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.