Differences in Perspectives and Policies Regarding End‐of‐Life Care Between Hematologists and Gastroenterologists

BACKGROUND: Patients with hematologic malignancies often receive aggressive treatment until the terminal phase and transition to end-of-life (EOL) care less frequently than those with solid tumors. A 2015 survey compared hematologists' and solid tumor-oncologists' attitudes toward EOL care, revealing differences. A decade later, no similar reports have appeared despite therapeutic advances. Therefore, we repeated the survey with additional questions to examine whether perspectives on EOL care have changed. METHODS: A 50-item questionnaire was administered to hematologists and gastroenterologists. Responses came from 121 hematologists treating hematologic cancers, 141 gastroenterologists treating gastrointestinal cancer including eight medical oncologists managing both. For analysis, hematologists were compared with 141 gastroenterologists. RESULTS: In both groups, refractory to standard therapy for cancer was the leading reason for initiating EOL care, with no significant differences. However, hematologists were less likely to transition ≥ 21% of patients to EOL care (p < 0.0001), more likely to register relapsed or refractory patients in clinical trials (p < 0.0001), to administer therapy to patients with 1-month expected survival and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 4 (p < 0.0001), and to cite barriers such as limited transfusions and restrictions on referrals to palliative care wards (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Hematologists' continuation of therapy in terminal patients and difficulty referring to palliative wards persisted since 2015, indicating unchanged attitudes. Additional findings confirmed reliance on clinical trials, and emphasis on transfusions, which may hinder timely EOL transitions in hematologic malignancies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Medicine
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.71872
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in Perspectives and Policies Regarding End‐of‐Life Care Between Hematologists and Gastroenterologists

Kunihiko Ishitani, Takuya Matsunaga, Takanori Teshima, Yusuke Sugama et al.
Cancer Medicine
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Differences in Perspectives and Policies Regarding End‐of‐Life Care Between Hematologists and Gastroenterologists

Kunihiko Ishitani, Takuya Matsunaga, Takanori Teshima, Yusuke Sugama, Kohichi Takada, Ken Sato, Masayoshi Kobune, Takayuki Machino, Kazuyuki Murase, Yasuhiro Nagaoka, Shiro Hinotsu
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with hematologic malignancies often receive aggressive treatment until the terminal phase and transition to end-of-life (EOL) care less frequently than those with solid tumors. A 2015 survey compared hematologists' and solid tumor-oncologists' attitudes toward EOL care, revealing differences. A decade later, no similar reports have appeared despite therapeutic advances. Therefore, we repeated the survey with additional questions to examine whether perspectives on EOL care have changed. METHODS: A 50-item questionnaire was administered to hematologists and gastroenterologists. Responses came from 121 hematologists treating hematologic cancers, 141 gastroenterologists treating gastrointestinal cancer including eight medical oncologists managing both. For analysis, hematologists were compared with 141 gastroenterologists. RESULTS: In both groups, refractory to standard therapy for cancer was the leading reason for initiating EOL care, with no significant differences. However, hematologists were less likely to transition ≥ 21% of patients to EOL care (p < 0.0001), more likely to register relapsed or refractory patients in clinical trials (p < 0.0001), to administer therapy to patients with 1-month expected survival and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 4 (p < 0.0001), and to cite barriers such as limited transfusions and restrictions on referrals to palliative care wards (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Hematologists' continuation of therapy in terminal patients and difficulty referring to palliative wards persisted since 2015, indicating unchanged attitudes. Additional findings confirmed reliance on clinical trials, and emphasis on transfusions, which may hinder timely EOL transitions in hematologic malignancies.

Cancer MedicineVol. 15(5)
Sapporo Medical University (JP), Hokkaido University (JP), Sapporo Higashi Tokushukai Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.