Significance of Pleural Fluid Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Pleural Fluid Protein as Additional Biomarkers in Differentiating Tubercular Pleural Effusions From Non-tubercular Effusions

Background: Tubercular pleural effusion (TPE) remains a significant diagnostic challenge in tuberculosis-endemic regions. Current diagnostic methods have substantial limitations, necessitating the investigation of complementary biomarkers. Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of pleural fluid neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and pleural fluid protein as adjunctive biomarkers, in combination with adenosine deaminase (ADA), for differentiating TPEs from non-tubercular effusions (NTEs). The secondary objective was to assess their potential clinical utility as simple, cost-effective adjuncts in routine diagnostic practice. Methods: A case-control study involving 50 patients (25 TPE cases, 25 NTE controls) was conducted at Vinayaka Missions Medical College and Hospital over 18 months. Pleural fluid was analyzed for protein concentration, cell counts (for NLR calculation), ADA levels, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection using CBNAAT (GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay; Cepheid, Sunnyvale, California, USA). Results: Mean pleural fluid NLR was significantly elevated in TPE (1.63 ± 6.37) versus NTE controls (0.77 ± 2.06; p = 0.047). Pleural fluid protein showed marked elevation in TPE patients (4.67 ± 2.36 g/dL) versus controls (2.90 ± 1.85 g/dL; p = 0.014). Pleural ADA demonstrated superior discrimination (TPE: 84.95 ± 21.10 U/L versus NTE: 21.45 ± 15.78 U/L; p < 0.0001). Combined analysis of elevated pleural protein, elevated NLR, and elevated ADA provided enhanced diagnostic accuracy: sensitivity: 96%, specificity: 92%, positive predictive value: 95%, and negative predictive value: 94%. Conclusion: Pleural fluid protein and NLR serve as useful adjunctive biomarkers in the diagnostic evaluation of pleural effusions. When combined with ADA, these readily available, cost-effective parameters substantially enhance diagnostic accuracy for differentiating TPEs from NTEs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.107817
Primary Topic
Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Significance of Pleural Fluid Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Pleural Fluid Protein as Additional Biomarkers in Differentiating Tubercular Pleural Effusions From Non-tubercular Effusions

Prabakaran Vaithinathan, Varunkrishnan G, Joby Wilson
Cureus
Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
article

Significance of Pleural Fluid Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Pleural Fluid Protein as Additional Biomarkers in Differentiating Tubercular Pleural Effusions From Non-tubercular Effusions

Prabakaran Vaithinathan, Varunkrishnan G, Joby Wilson
article en

Abstract

Background: Tubercular pleural effusion (TPE) remains a significant diagnostic challenge in tuberculosis-endemic regions. Current diagnostic methods have substantial limitations, necessitating the investigation of complementary biomarkers. Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of pleural fluid neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and pleural fluid protein as adjunctive biomarkers, in combination with adenosine deaminase (ADA), for differentiating TPEs from non-tubercular effusions (NTEs). The secondary objective was to assess their potential clinical utility as simple, cost-effective adjuncts in routine diagnostic practice. Methods: A case-control study involving 50 patients (25 TPE cases, 25 NTE controls) was conducted at Vinayaka Missions Medical College and Hospital over 18 months. Pleural fluid was analyzed for protein concentration, cell counts (for NLR calculation), ADA levels, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection using CBNAAT (GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay; Cepheid, Sunnyvale, California, USA). Results: Mean pleural fluid NLR was significantly elevated in TPE (1.63 ± 6.37) versus NTE controls (0.77 ± 2.06; p = 0.047). Pleural fluid protein showed marked elevation in TPE patients (4.67 ± 2.36 g/dL) versus controls (2.90 ± 1.85 g/dL; p = 0.014). Pleural ADA demonstrated superior discrimination (TPE: 84.95 ± 21.10 U/L versus NTE: 21.45 ± 15.78 U/L; p < 0.0001). Combined analysis of elevated pleural protein, elevated NLR, and elevated ADA provided enhanced diagnostic accuracy: sensitivity: 96%, specificity: 92%, positive predictive value: 95%, and negative predictive value: 94%. Conclusion: Pleural fluid protein and NLR serve as useful adjunctive biomarkers in the diagnostic evaluation of pleural effusions. When combined with ADA, these readily available, cost-effective parameters substantially enhance diagnostic accuracy for differentiating TPEs from NTEs.

Cureus
Vinayaka Missions University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.