A consensus model for implementation of genomics in Queensland Health – a Delphi study

As genomic technologies in healthcare expand, health systems face integration challenges. This study aimed to consolidate collective expertise, experiences, and existing knowledge from local, statewide, and national genomics projects to inform a model of care for integrating and delivering genomic services in the Queensland public health system. We used a modified Delphi methodology with three survey rounds to achieve expert consensus on the model of care. We analysed quantitative data using descriptive statistics and qualitative data using content analysis. From 112 invited experts, 43 participants took part. The model of care comprised 30 actions across three phases: pre-test, testing, and post-test. Consensus (≥ 75% agreement) was achieved on 25 of the actions, with 5 included with specific considerations. Ten recommendations were developed, including building sustainability, improving access to specialists through a distributed model, and investing in clinical-pathology partnerships and infrastructures. These findings may inform a comprehensive, stakeholder-informed, system-level implementation effort for mainstreaming genomic medicine that is practical, feasible, and acceptable to key stakeholders across the system. The three-phase model of care provides a structured approach to genomic service delivery and has the potential to significantly improve patient access and healthcare delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Genomics
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40246-026-00941-y
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A consensus model for implementation of genomics in Queensland Health – a Delphi study

Zoe Fehlberg, Andrew John Mallett, Senel Idrisoglu, Mathilde R. Desselle et al.
Human Genomics
Delphi Technique in Research
article

A consensus model for implementation of genomics in Queensland Health – a Delphi study

Zoe Fehlberg, Andrew John Mallett, Senel Idrisoglu, Mathilde R. Desselle, Minh Viet Bui, Stephanie Best, Saras Menon
article en

Abstract

As genomic technologies in healthcare expand, health systems face integration challenges. This study aimed to consolidate collective expertise, experiences, and existing knowledge from local, statewide, and national genomics projects to inform a model of care for integrating and delivering genomic services in the Queensland public health system. We used a modified Delphi methodology with three survey rounds to achieve expert consensus on the model of care. We analysed quantitative data using descriptive statistics and qualitative data using content analysis. From 112 invited experts, 43 participants took part. The model of care comprised 30 actions across three phases: pre-test, testing, and post-test. Consensus (≥ 75% agreement) was achieved on 25 of the actions, with 5 included with specific considerations. Ten recommendations were developed, including building sustainability, improving access to specialists through a distributed model, and investing in clinical-pathology partnerships and infrastructures. These findings may inform a comprehensive, stakeholder-informed, system-level implementation effort for mainstreaming genomic medicine that is practical, feasible, and acceptable to key stakeholders across the system. The three-phase model of care provides a structured approach to genomic service delivery and has the potential to significantly improve patient access and healthcare delivery.

Human Genomics
Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Townsville Hospital (AU), Family Planning NSW (AU), James Cook University (AU)
Queensland Health
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Delphi Technique in Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.