Using Simulated Training Data to Locate Archaeological Sites with Machine Learning

Abstract Archaeologists have demonstrated the value of deep learning models for detecting archaeological objects in lidar data. As landscape-level projects become the norm, archaeological data derived from deep learning predictions can be integrated into these initiatives through coupled natural-cultural landscapes planning. However, the paucity of archaeological training datasets limits the application of deep learning models to relatively common and well-documented object classes. Using procedurally generated training datasets may be one approach to overcome this bottleneck. To test the efficacy of procedural generation for developing deep learning training data, we trained models to detect a novel object class (hypothesized historic tar kilns) in the Kisatchie National Forest in Louisiana. We developed two procedural generation approaches to embed simulated archaeological objects in a lidar-derived DEM and used these datasets to train deep learning (Mask R-CNN) models. We then evaluated model predictions within lidar-derived visualizations and during field survey. Our trained models detected targets with high recall but low precision. Field investigation suggested that the objects were not tar kilns but a different historic feature class. This study suggests that models trained on simulated objects are a useful addition to lidar analysis tool kits and can be directly integrated into archaeological field investigation workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Archaeological Practice
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2025.10130
Primary Topic
Archaeological Research and Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Simulated Training Data to Locate Archaeological Sites with Machine Learning

Matthew Helmer, Katherine Peck, Claudine Gravel‐Miguel, Grant Snitker
Advances in Archaeological Practice
Archaeological Research and Protection
article

Using Simulated Training Data to Locate Archaeological Sites with Machine Learning

Matthew Helmer, Katherine Peck, Claudine Gravel‐Miguel, Grant Snitker
article en

Abstract

Abstract Archaeologists have demonstrated the value of deep learning models for detecting archaeological objects in lidar data. As landscape-level projects become the norm, archaeological data derived from deep learning predictions can be integrated into these initiatives through coupled natural-cultural landscapes planning. However, the paucity of archaeological training datasets limits the application of deep learning models to relatively common and well-documented object classes. Using procedurally generated training datasets may be one approach to overcome this bottleneck. To test the efficacy of procedural generation for developing deep learning training data, we trained models to detect a novel object class (hypothesized historic tar kilns) in the Kisatchie National Forest in Louisiana. We developed two procedural generation approaches to embed simulated archaeological objects in a lidar-derived DEM and used these datasets to train deep learning (Mask R-CNN) models. We then evaluated model predictions within lidar-derived visualizations and during field survey. Our trained models detected targets with high recall but low precision. Field investigation suggested that the objects were not tar kilns but a different historic feature class. This study suggests that models trained on simulated objects are a useful addition to lidar analysis tool kits and can be directly integrated into archaeological field investigation workflows.

Advances in Archaeological Practice
Louisiana State University (US), Utah State University (US), New Mexico Consortium (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Forest Service
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Archaeological Research and Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.