Validity and reliability of arthrometer-based measures of the first ray relative and absolute mobility: A cadaveric biomechanical study

First ray hypermobility is implicated in many forefoot pathologies, yet its quantitative assessment remains challenging. Instrumented methods have traditionally focused on isolated dorsal displacement of the first metatarsal, which may not reflect physiological load sharing within the forefoot. This cadaveric biomechanical study evaluated the reliability and construct validity of two arthrometer-based measures: the first ray absolute (FRAM) and relative (FRRM) mobility, respectively assessed under isolated loading of the first metatarsal and symmetrical loading of the first metatarsal and lesser metatarsals. Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric lower limb segments were tested using an automated forefoot arthrometer. Within-session reliability was quantified using intraclass correlation coefficients, standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change. Construct validity was assessed by correlating FRAM and FRRM with a biomechanical reference construct defined as the sum of superior-inferior translations at the first tarsometatarsal and medial naviculo-cuneiform joints measured using optical motion capture. Linear mixed-effects models were used to characterise joint-level kinematic behaviour under each loading mode. FRRM demonstrated excellent within-session reliability (ICC = 1.00) and a high positive correlation with the reference construct (R = 0.70, p < 0.001). FRAM also showed excellent reliability (ICC = 0.97) but higher absolute measurement error and a moderate positive correlation with the reference construct (R = 0.63, p < 0.001). Symmetric loading engaged proximal first ray joints more effectively than isolated loading, which predominantly mobilised the first tarsometatarsal joint. These findings indicate that arthrometer-based assessment of the first ray mobility is sensitive to the loading mode and that symmetric loading provides a more biomechanically representative evaluation of the first ray mobility than traditional isolated approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biomechanics
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2026.113340
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity and reliability of arthrometer-based measures of the first ray relative and absolute mobility: A cadaveric biomechanical study

Quentin Praz, Alberto Bailez, Jérémy Olivier, Florent Moissenet et al.
Journal of Biomechanics
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Validity and reliability of arthrometer-based measures of the first ray relative and absolute mobility: A cadaveric biomechanical study

Quentin Praz, Alberto Bailez, Jérémy Olivier, Florent Moissenet, Spyridon Schoinas, Mickaël Chollet, Stéphane Armand, Mathieu Assal, Antoine Acker
article en

Abstract

First ray hypermobility is implicated in many forefoot pathologies, yet its quantitative assessment remains challenging. Instrumented methods have traditionally focused on isolated dorsal displacement of the first metatarsal, which may not reflect physiological load sharing within the forefoot. This cadaveric biomechanical study evaluated the reliability and construct validity of two arthrometer-based measures: the first ray absolute (FRAM) and relative (FRRM) mobility, respectively assessed under isolated loading of the first metatarsal and symmetrical loading of the first metatarsal and lesser metatarsals. Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric lower limb segments were tested using an automated forefoot arthrometer. Within-session reliability was quantified using intraclass correlation coefficients, standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change. Construct validity was assessed by correlating FRAM and FRRM with a biomechanical reference construct defined as the sum of superior-inferior translations at the first tarsometatarsal and medial naviculo-cuneiform joints measured using optical motion capture. Linear mixed-effects models were used to characterise joint-level kinematic behaviour under each loading mode. FRRM demonstrated excellent within-session reliability (ICC = 1.00) and a high positive correlation with the reference construct (R = 0.70, p < 0.001). FRAM also showed excellent reliability (ICC = 0.97) but higher absolute measurement error and a moderate positive correlation with the reference construct (R = 0.63, p < 0.001). Symmetric loading engaged proximal first ray joints more effectively than isolated loading, which predominantly mobilised the first tarsometatarsal joint. These findings indicate that arthrometer-based assessment of the first ray mobility is sensitive to the loading mode and that symmetric loading provides a more biomechanically representative evaluation of the first ray mobility than traditional isolated approaches.

Journal of BiomechanicsVol. 203
University of Geneva (CH), HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (CH), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (US), University Hospital of Geneva (CH), The Geneva Foundation (US), Geneva College (US)
Innosuisse - Schweizerische Agentur für Innovationsförderung
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.