Challenges and Frontiers in the Circularity of Polymer Additive Manufacturing: A Systematic Review of Recycling Pathways and Material Degradation

Additive Manufacturing (AM) is frequently framed as a sustainable production paradigm due to its material efficiency and design flexibility. However, this narrative often overlooks the complex challenges associated with the end-of-life (EoL) management of polymer components. This systematic review critically evaluates the recyclability of AM polymers by examining the intersection of material chemistry, manufacturing-induced degradation, and the inherent heterogeneity of AM waste streams. Drawing from a corpus of 175 studies (2015–2025), this work assesses both mechanical and chemical recycling pathways for thermoplastics and thermosets. The findings reveal a significant disparity between theoretical recyclability and practical circularity. Common thermoplastics, such as PLA, ABS, and PA12, exhibit rapid thermomechanical degradation, typically losing structural integrity and mechanical performance after only one to three recycling cycles. Furthermore, photopolymer resins used in high-precision AM processes present a critical barrier, as current technologies remain largely incapable of reintegrating these materials into circular value chains. The critical review identifies several AM-specific obstacles such as mechanical anisotropy, contamination from support structures, and the complexity of multi-material parts that render recycling both technically challenging and economically unviable. Furthermore, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) data further suggests that the environmental benefits of AM recycling are frequently offset by high energy demands. The study concludes that achieving a truly circular polymer AM ecosystem requires more than isolated technical improvements. It demands systemic interventions in “Design for Recycling” (DfR), the development of more resilient polymer blends, the establishment of industry standards, and the expansion of specialized waste management infrastructure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Manufacturing
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53941/jmem.2026.100019
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges and Frontiers in the Circularity of Polymer Additive Manufacturing: A Systematic Review of Recycling Pathways and Material Degradation

Naiara P. V. Sebbe, Rita C. M. Sales-Contini, F.J.G. Silva, André F. V. Pedroso et al.
Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Manufacturing
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Challenges and Frontiers in the Circularity of Polymer Additive Manufacturing: A Systematic Review of Recycling Pathways and Material Degradation

Naiara P. V. Sebbe, Rita C. M. Sales-Contini, F.J.G. Silva, André F. V. Pedroso, Filipa Pacheco
article en

Abstract

Additive Manufacturing (AM) is frequently framed as a sustainable production paradigm due to its material efficiency and design flexibility. However, this narrative often overlooks the complex challenges associated with the end-of-life (EoL) management of polymer components. This systematic review critically evaluates the recyclability of AM polymers by examining the intersection of material chemistry, manufacturing-induced degradation, and the inherent heterogeneity of AM waste streams. Drawing from a corpus of 175 studies (2015–2025), this work assesses both mechanical and chemical recycling pathways for thermoplastics and thermosets. The findings reveal a significant disparity between theoretical recyclability and practical circularity. Common thermoplastics, such as PLA, ABS, and PA12, exhibit rapid thermomechanical degradation, typically losing structural integrity and mechanical performance after only one to three recycling cycles. Furthermore, photopolymer resins used in high-precision AM processes present a critical barrier, as current technologies remain largely incapable of reintegrating these materials into circular value chains. The critical review identifies several AM-specific obstacles such as mechanical anisotropy, contamination from support structures, and the complexity of multi-material parts that render recycling both technically challenging and economically unviable. Furthermore, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) data further suggests that the environmental benefits of AM recycling are frequently offset by high energy demands. The study concludes that achieving a truly circular polymer AM ecosystem requires more than isolated technical improvements. It demands systemic interventions in “Design for Recycling” (DfR), the development of more resilient polymer blends, the establishment of industry standards, and the expansion of specialized waste management infrastructure.

Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Manufacturing
Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (BR), Institute of Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Mangement (PT), Instituto de Aeronáutica e Espaço (BR), Laboratório Associado de Energia, Transportes e Aeronáutica (PT), Polytechnic Institute of Porto (PT)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.