Quality Assurance in Decentralized Manufacturing: A Review of Validation Frameworks for 3D-Printed Personalized Medicines

Background The pharmaceutical industry is in a paradigm shift in which the mass-production model based on one-size-fits-all is being replaced by the patient-centric model that is made possible by three-dimensional printing (3DP) and decentralized manufacturing (DM). Although 3DP enables the personalization of dosage form as never before, the translation of the technology into clinical practice is complicated by the complicated quality assurance (QA) and validation barriers. Purpose: This review critically synthesizes the existing validation frameworks of 3DP personalized medicines with special emphasis on the combination of Process Analytical Technology (PAT), Digital Twins, and the recently implemented UK MHRA 2025 regulatory framework. Methodology: Scopus-indexed literature (20192026) was searched in a PRISMA-compliant systematic search that focused on point-of-care (POC) manufacturing, real-time release testing (RTRT), and data integrity. Core Mechanisms: We consider technical modalities, such as Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), Semi-Solid Extrusion (SSE), and Selective Laser Sintering (SLS), their respective Critical Process Parameters (CPPs) and Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs). Findings: The review identifies the Hub-and-Spoke model as the most feasible structure of decentralized QA with centralized hubs that address the issue of integrity of the pharma-ink and decentralized spokes that address the issue of process validation. In-line Near-Infrared (NIR) and Raman spectroscopy technologies that enable the real time release of doses are accurate and non-destructive (R 2 = 0.98) and allow real time verification of doses. Moreover, the Digital Twin technology improves three-stage process validation lifecycle, providing predictive maintenance and proactive quality management. Conclusion: To attain sustainable clinical implementation of the 3DP, a radical change toward Quality-by-Design (QbD) and a powerful digital infrastructure is required. In the coming 2026 and beyond, we suggest a roadmap to standardize decentralized validation to achieve the best safety and efficacy of personalized medicines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19824634
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality Assurance in Decentralized Manufacturing: A Review of Validation Frameworks for 3D-Printed Personalized Medicines

Chatterjee Ritam, Rudra Sourav, Kundu Shristi, Dalai Sucheta et al.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
article

Quality Assurance in Decentralized Manufacturing: A Review of Validation Frameworks for 3D-Printed Personalized Medicines

Chatterjee Ritam, Rudra Sourav, Kundu Shristi, Dalai Sucheta, Chatterjee Poulomi, Majumdar Shirsha, Karmakar Santu, Joardar Bikram, Gazi Anisha
article en

Abstract

Background The pharmaceutical industry is in a paradigm shift in which the mass-production model based on one-size-fits-all is being replaced by the patient-centric model that is made possible by three-dimensional printing (3DP) and decentralized manufacturing (DM). Although 3DP enables the personalization of dosage form as never before, the translation of the technology into clinical practice is complicated by the complicated quality assurance (QA) and validation barriers. Purpose: This review critically synthesizes the existing validation frameworks of 3DP personalized medicines with special emphasis on the combination of Process Analytical Technology (PAT), Digital Twins, and the recently implemented UK MHRA 2025 regulatory framework. Methodology: Scopus-indexed literature (20192026) was searched in a PRISMA-compliant systematic search that focused on point-of-care (POC) manufacturing, real-time release testing (RTRT), and data integrity. Core Mechanisms: We consider technical modalities, such as Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), Semi-Solid Extrusion (SSE), and Selective Laser Sintering (SLS), their respective Critical Process Parameters (CPPs) and Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs). Findings: The review identifies the Hub-and-Spoke model as the most feasible structure of decentralized QA with centralized hubs that address the issue of integrity of the pharma-ink and decentralized spokes that address the issue of process validation. In-line Near-Infrared (NIR) and Raman spectroscopy technologies that enable the real time release of doses are accurate and non-destructive (R 2 = 0.98) and allow real time verification of doses. Moreover, the Digital Twin technology improves three-stage process validation lifecycle, providing predictive maintenance and proactive quality management. Conclusion: To attain sustainable clinical implementation of the 3DP, a radical change toward Quality-by-Design (QbD) and a powerful digital infrastructure is required. In the coming 2026 and beyond, we suggest a roadmap to standardize decentralized validation to achieve the best safety and efficacy of personalized medicines.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology Surat (IN), National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (IN), Berhampur University (IN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.