Psychological predictors of noticing and interpreting inequality in daily life

Despite growing interest in socioeconomic inequality, little research has examined how it is perceived in naturalistic, everyday settings. This study employed the Experience Sampling Method to investigate individuals’ real-time experiences of inequality, operationalized as perceptions of social class differences. Based on 6,150 momentary reports from 301 participants in Asia, we identified individual-level variables associated with these perceptions. Our findings suggest that inequality is not always salient in daily life—people do not constantly notice it, and even when they do, they may not compare themselves to others or view the differences as unfair. Notably, individual differences strongly shape these perceptions: social-comparison orientation was consistently associated with two key outcomes—attending to class differences and engaging in self-comparison. Additionally, participants with stronger power distance beliefs and greater fear-based xenophobia toward migrant workers were more likely to perceive class differences. Those scoring high on social dominance orientation, materialism, and fear-based xenophobia toward expatriates were more inclined to compare themselves to others, while those with greater fear-based xenophobia toward expatriates and stronger egalitarian beliefs (lower social dominance orientation) perceived class differences as less fair. These findings shed light on psychological mechanisms that shape how inequality is experienced and evaluated in daily life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47598-0
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological predictors of noticing and interpreting inequality in daily life

C Y J Chen, Andy J. Yap, Kelly Nault, Jonathan W. K. Pow
Scientific Reports
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Psychological predictors of noticing and interpreting inequality in daily life

C Y J Chen, Andy J. Yap, Kelly Nault, Jonathan W. K. Pow
article en

Abstract

Despite growing interest in socioeconomic inequality, little research has examined how it is perceived in naturalistic, everyday settings. This study employed the Experience Sampling Method to investigate individuals’ real-time experiences of inequality, operationalized as perceptions of social class differences. Based on 6,150 momentary reports from 301 participants in Asia, we identified individual-level variables associated with these perceptions. Our findings suggest that inequality is not always salient in daily life—people do not constantly notice it, and even when they do, they may not compare themselves to others or view the differences as unfair. Notably, individual differences strongly shape these perceptions: social-comparison orientation was consistently associated with two key outcomes—attending to class differences and engaging in self-comparison. Additionally, participants with stronger power distance beliefs and greater fear-based xenophobia toward migrant workers were more likely to perceive class differences. Those scoring high on social dominance orientation, materialism, and fear-based xenophobia toward expatriates were more inclined to compare themselves to others, while those with greater fear-based xenophobia toward expatriates and stronger egalitarian beliefs (lower social dominance orientation) perceived class differences as less fair. These findings shed light on psychological mechanisms that shape how inequality is experienced and evaluated in daily life.

Scientific Reports
IE University (ES), Nanyang Technological University (SG), INSEAD (SG)
Ministry of Education - Singapore
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Psychological predictors of noticing and interpreting inequality in daily life — C Y J Chen, Andy J. Yap, et al. · Scientific Reports (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS