Does integrating pelvic tilt change from sitting to standing in functional 3D planning enhance early complications of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty?

Aims: While robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) improves implant positioning accuracy, it often overlooks dynamic lumbopelvic parameters, such as pelvic tilt changes between sitting and standing. These factors are increasingly recognized as critical in preventing early complications, such as impingement and dislocation. The aim was to determine whether integrating pelvic tilt variations into functional 3D planning reduces complications and improves outcomes following THA. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 656 patients underwent robotic-assisted THA using either conventional CT-based planning (V3) or functional kinematic-based planning (V4). The V4 group incorporated lumbopelvic kinematics, specifically pelvic tilt in seated and standing positions, into implant planning via a collision model. Outcomes at ≥ one year included complication rates (dislocations, periprosthetic fractures, reoperations) and functional outcomes (visual analogue scale, Harris Hip Score, Oxford Hip Score, Forgotten Joint Score). Results: Compared with V3, the V4 group had significantly fewer overall complications (2.8% vs 8.4%, p = 0.007), no dislocations (0% vs 1.7%, p = 0.048), and fewer reoperations (p = 0.017). Reoperation-free survival at two years was higher in the V4 group (97.2% vs 94.1%). Functional outcomes were significantly improved across all scores, with more patients achieving patient acceptable symptom state thresholds (p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, functional planning (V4) was the only independent protective factor against reoperation, while age, sex, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, smoking, approach, and insert type were not significantly associated. Conclusion: Functional planning that incorporates the kinematics of the lumbopelvic complex (V4) was the only independent protective factor against reoperation, highlighting the importance of integrating lumbopelvic dynamics into robotic-assisted THA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bone & Joint Open
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.74.bjo-2025-0381.r1
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does integrating pelvic tilt change from sitting to standing in functional 3D planning enhance early complications of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty?

Pascal Kouyoumdjïan, Rémy Coulomb, Thomas Grosso, Anthony Marquant
Bone & Joint Open
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
article

Does integrating pelvic tilt change from sitting to standing in functional 3D planning enhance early complications of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty?

Pascal Kouyoumdjïan, Rémy Coulomb, Thomas Grosso, Anthony Marquant
article en

Abstract

Aims: While robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) improves implant positioning accuracy, it often overlooks dynamic lumbopelvic parameters, such as pelvic tilt changes between sitting and standing. These factors are increasingly recognized as critical in preventing early complications, such as impingement and dislocation. The aim was to determine whether integrating pelvic tilt variations into functional 3D planning reduces complications and improves outcomes following THA. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 656 patients underwent robotic-assisted THA using either conventional CT-based planning (V3) or functional kinematic-based planning (V4). The V4 group incorporated lumbopelvic kinematics, specifically pelvic tilt in seated and standing positions, into implant planning via a collision model. Outcomes at ≥ one year included complication rates (dislocations, periprosthetic fractures, reoperations) and functional outcomes (visual analogue scale, Harris Hip Score, Oxford Hip Score, Forgotten Joint Score). Results: Compared with V3, the V4 group had significantly fewer overall complications (2.8% vs 8.4%, p = 0.007), no dislocations (0% vs 1.7%, p = 0.048), and fewer reoperations (p = 0.017). Reoperation-free survival at two years was higher in the V4 group (97.2% vs 94.1%). Functional outcomes were significantly improved across all scores, with more patients achieving patient acceptable symptom state thresholds (p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, functional planning (V4) was the only independent protective factor against reoperation, while age, sex, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, smoking, approach, and insert type were not significantly associated. Conclusion: Functional planning that incorporates the kinematics of the lumbopelvic complex (V4) was the only independent protective factor against reoperation, highlighting the importance of integrating lumbopelvic dynamics into robotic-assisted THA.

Bone & Joint OpenVol. 7(4)
Université de Montpellier (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier (FR), Université de Nîmes (FR)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.