Predicting primary aldosteronism: risk stratification-based and machine learning-based models

AIMS: Primary aldosteronism (PA) screening is difficult in an unselected population of hypertensive patients, as it can be challenging. We report new algorithms based either on risk stratification or machine learning models to improve the screening of PA. METHODS AND RESULTS: 15,507 patients with confirmed hypertension aged 18-65 years with full workup for PA screening were included in this study. We developed PAstrat, a risk stratification-based algorithm by generating patient groups of interest and assess probability of PA in each group, and two different machine learning models, logistic regression and XGBoost. An external cohort of 768 patients was used for validation. The AUC of the ROC curves for the PAstrat algorithm, logistic regression, and XGboost were, respectively, 0.80, 0.82, and 0.83 in the derivation cohort and 0.79, 0.82, and 0.82 in the validation cohort. Only 0.7% of the population (6 of 768) or 4.2% of patients with PA (6 of 142) had PA despite incorrect prediction by PAstrat (negative predictive value, 0.96). Conversely, among the 128 patients who had an indication for PA screening based on age, kalaemia, or drug resistance but not according to the algorithm, only 3 (0.23%) patients had PA. Logistic regression and XGBoost had, respectively, 49 (6.7%) and 84 (10.9%) false negatives (negative predictive value, respectively, 0.87 and 0.88). CONCLUSION: We developed a risk stratification algorithm for PA screening and compared its performances to machine learning models. Our algorithm demonstrated good sensitivity and negative predictive value for the screening of secondary hypertension, with the added value of great interpretability. Machine learning models lacked explainability and demonstrated a lower negative value in the validation cohort which makes them less easily usable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwag197
Primary Topic
Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting primary aldosteronism: risk stratification-based and machine learning-based models

Antoine Crémer, Jean Feydy, Bastien Rance, Stéphanie Baron et al.
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
article

Predicting primary aldosteronism: risk stratification-based and machine learning-based models

Antoine Crémer, Jean Feydy, Bastien Rance, Stéphanie Baron, Philippe Gosse, Michel Azizi, Laurence Amar, Romain Boulestreau, Jean-Baptiste de Freminville
article en

Abstract

AIMS: Primary aldosteronism (PA) screening is difficult in an unselected population of hypertensive patients, as it can be challenging. We report new algorithms based either on risk stratification or machine learning models to improve the screening of PA. METHODS AND RESULTS: 15,507 patients with confirmed hypertension aged 18-65 years with full workup for PA screening were included in this study. We developed PAstrat, a risk stratification-based algorithm by generating patient groups of interest and assess probability of PA in each group, and two different machine learning models, logistic regression and XGBoost. An external cohort of 768 patients was used for validation. The AUC of the ROC curves for the PAstrat algorithm, logistic regression, and XGboost were, respectively, 0.80, 0.82, and 0.83 in the derivation cohort and 0.79, 0.82, and 0.82 in the validation cohort. Only 0.7% of the population (6 of 768) or 4.2% of patients with PA (6 of 142) had PA despite incorrect prediction by PAstrat (negative predictive value, 0.96). Conversely, among the 128 patients who had an indication for PA screening based on age, kalaemia, or drug resistance but not according to the algorithm, only 3 (0.23%) patients had PA. Logistic regression and XGBoost had, respectively, 49 (6.7%) and 84 (10.9%) false negatives (negative predictive value, respectively, 0.87 and 0.88). CONCLUSION: We developed a risk stratification algorithm for PA screening and compared its performances to machine learning models. Our algorithm demonstrated good sensitivity and negative predictive value for the screening of secondary hypertension, with the added value of great interpretability. Machine learning models lacked explainability and demonstrated a lower negative value in the validation cohort which makes them less easily usable.

European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Université de Tours (FR), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Inserm (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou (FR), Bordeaux Population Health (FR), Hôpital Européen (FR), Hôpital Saint-André (FR), Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (FR), Unit of Functional and Adaptive Biology (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.