Effects of a hybrid online/in-person implementation of the complete health improvement program on biomarkers, biometrics, and drug utilization in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pilot randomized-controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Randomized-controlled trials of the Complete Health Improvement Program (CHIP) were conducted before new-generation pharmacotherapies, such as GLP-1 and SGLT2 agents, were available. Other attempts to characterize the impact of CHIP since the advent of modern therapies lacked control groups. A new study is needed to evaluate the impact of CHIP on a population with access to modern pharmacotherapies. METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to CHIP over 12 weeks in a hybrid online/in-person format plus usual care or usual care alone, which consisted of access to standard Geisinger Health Plan diabetes-related services. Feasibility measures included recruitment, retention and participation rates. Clinical efficacy outcomes included change in HbA1c, weight, waist circumference, lifestyle survey results, and diabetes drug utilization by drug class at 3 and 6 months versus baseline. RESULTS: Recruitment fell short of the targeted 60 patients (N = 25 enrolled, 13 and 12 patients randomized to the intervention and control groups, respectively). 69% of intervention participants who attended baseline visits completed at least 50% of classes, which was slightly below the target of ≥ 70%. Lifestyle survey participation was low but suggested improvements in nutrition, exercise, and sleep among intervention participants who did complete surveys. At 6 months, change in HbA1c was - 0.46% [95% CI - 0.93, 0.01] and - 0.58% [95% CI - 0.95, - 0.22] for the intervention and control groups, respectively. Patients in the intervention group collectively weaned off insulin therapy vs. escalated insulin therapy in the control group. There was a reduction in waist circumference in the intervention group compared to an increase in the control group (- 4.65 [95% CI - 9.71, 0.41] vs. 0.56 [95% CI - 1.66, 2.78] inches, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Lifestyle and clinical data from this pilot clinical trial mostly aligned with previous studies. A larger trial is needed to confirm the benefits of CHIP for body composition, to further characterize the clinical effects of CHIP participation, and to understand interactions between lifestyle intervention and modern T2DM pharmacotherapy. Feasibility issues identified in this pilot study would need to be overcome to accomplish such a trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 05/20/2021. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04924400.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-026-01828-4
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of a hybrid online/in-person implementation of the complete health improvement program on biomarkers, biometrics, and drug utilization in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pilot randomized-controlled trial

Avery Schulze, H. Lester Kirchner, Kristina Blessing, Thomas Morland et al.
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Diabetes Management and Education
article

Effects of a hybrid online/in-person implementation of the complete health improvement program on biomarkers, biometrics, and drug utilization in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pilot randomized-controlled trial

Avery Schulze, H. Lester Kirchner, Kristina Blessing, Thomas Morland, James Persing, Ryan McNally, Taryn Wilk, Sheila Packer, Erin VanEnkevort
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Randomized-controlled trials of the Complete Health Improvement Program (CHIP) were conducted before new-generation pharmacotherapies, such as GLP-1 and SGLT2 agents, were available. Other attempts to characterize the impact of CHIP since the advent of modern therapies lacked control groups. A new study is needed to evaluate the impact of CHIP on a population with access to modern pharmacotherapies. METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to CHIP over 12 weeks in a hybrid online/in-person format plus usual care or usual care alone, which consisted of access to standard Geisinger Health Plan diabetes-related services. Feasibility measures included recruitment, retention and participation rates. Clinical efficacy outcomes included change in HbA1c, weight, waist circumference, lifestyle survey results, and diabetes drug utilization by drug class at 3 and 6 months versus baseline. RESULTS: Recruitment fell short of the targeted 60 patients (N = 25 enrolled, 13 and 12 patients randomized to the intervention and control groups, respectively). 69% of intervention participants who attended baseline visits completed at least 50% of classes, which was slightly below the target of ≥ 70%. Lifestyle survey participation was low but suggested improvements in nutrition, exercise, and sleep among intervention participants who did complete surveys. At 6 months, change in HbA1c was - 0.46% [95% CI - 0.93, 0.01] and - 0.58% [95% CI - 0.95, - 0.22] for the intervention and control groups, respectively. Patients in the intervention group collectively weaned off insulin therapy vs. escalated insulin therapy in the control group. There was a reduction in waist circumference in the intervention group compared to an increase in the control group (- 4.65 [95% CI - 9.71, 0.41] vs. 0.56 [95% CI - 1.66, 2.78] inches, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Lifestyle and clinical data from this pilot clinical trial mostly aligned with previous studies. A larger trial is needed to confirm the benefits of CHIP for body composition, to further characterize the clinical effects of CHIP participation, and to understand interactions between lifestyle intervention and modern T2DM pharmacotherapy. Feasibility issues identified in this pilot study would need to be overcome to accomplish such a trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 05/20/2021. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04924400.

Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Geisinger Medical Center (US), Miller College (US), WellSpan York Hospital (US), Geisinger Neuroscience Institute (US), Geisinger Health System (US)
Geisinger Health System Foundation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Diabetes Management and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.