First global carbon dynamics from an observational and process-informed hybrid perspective: Oversimplified respiration representation likely drives divergence in terrestrial carbon sequestration across models

Process-based biosphere models, which formulate biophysical ecosystem processes, provide a mechanistic framework for understanding terrestrial carbon dynamics. In contrast, data-driven approaches, e.g., upscaling eddy covariance (EC) fluxes using satellite observations and machine learning, offer empirical estimates. These complementary methods often diverge significantly, particularly in estimating global photosynthetic uptake and ecosystem respiration, with discrepancies exceeding 50 PgC yr − 1 and highlighting persistent uncertainties. To bridge this gap, we adopt a hybrid strategy that embeds physiological understanding via semi-empirical models, refines it with EC fluxes constrained by machine learning, and integrates process-based allocation to resolve component fluxes. This process-informed hybrid approach links ecological knowledge with predictive models, enabling generalisation beyond flux tower sites and supporting the development of new insights. We assess global carbon dynamics over the past two decades, applying Bayesian inference to evaluate climate impacts on land carbon processes. Our study delivers the first observational and process-informed hybrid assessment of global carbon flux and stock changes. Notably, while gross carbon uptake is consistent across methods ( ≈ 130 PgC yr − 1 in 2022, increasing by 0.4 annually), net carbon uptake estimates diverge, from 6 PgC yr − 1 in process-based models to 26 in conventional upscaling, and 16 in our hybrid model, reflecting structural differences in respiration parameterisation. Improved representation of respiratory processes is essential to capture the competing roles of photosynthesis and respiration under climate change. Despite rising global carbon fluxes and biomass stocks, tipping point risks remain: in tropical regions, increased photosynthesis (0.1 PgC yr − 1 ) is offset by rising respiration (0.05 PgC yr − 1 ). • A hybrid, process-informed ML framework reconciles carbon flux estimates. • GPP estimates are consistent across methods, but ecosystem respiration diverges. • Carbon sink responses vary, rising respiration offsets CO 2 gains in tropics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2026.111197
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

First global carbon dynamics from an observational and process-informed hybrid perspective: Oversimplified respiration representation likely drives divergence in terrestrial carbon sequestration across models

Vasileios Myrgiotis, J. Dash, Wenquan Dong, J Q Xu et al.
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
article

First global carbon dynamics from an observational and process-informed hybrid perspective: Oversimplified respiration representation likely drives divergence in terrestrial carbon sequestration across models

Vasileios Myrgiotis, J. Dash, Wenquan Dong, J Q Xu, Man Chen, Songyan Zhu, Pablo Reyes-Muñoz, Rui Ma, Mana Gharun
article en

Abstract

Process-based biosphere models, which formulate biophysical ecosystem processes, provide a mechanistic framework for understanding terrestrial carbon dynamics. In contrast, data-driven approaches, e.g., upscaling eddy covariance (EC) fluxes using satellite observations and machine learning, offer empirical estimates. These complementary methods often diverge significantly, particularly in estimating global photosynthetic uptake and ecosystem respiration, with discrepancies exceeding 50 PgC yr − 1 and highlighting persistent uncertainties. To bridge this gap, we adopt a hybrid strategy that embeds physiological understanding via semi-empirical models, refines it with EC fluxes constrained by machine learning, and integrates process-based allocation to resolve component fluxes. This process-informed hybrid approach links ecological knowledge with predictive models, enabling generalisation beyond flux tower sites and supporting the development of new insights. We assess global carbon dynamics over the past two decades, applying Bayesian inference to evaluate climate impacts on land carbon processes. Our study delivers the first observational and process-informed hybrid assessment of global carbon flux and stock changes. Notably, while gross carbon uptake is consistent across methods ( ≈ 130 PgC yr − 1 in 2022, increasing by 0.4 annually), net carbon uptake estimates diverge, from 6 PgC yr − 1 in process-based models to 26 in conventional upscaling, and 16 in our hybrid model, reflecting structural differences in respiration parameterisation. Improved representation of respiratory processes is essential to capture the competing roles of photosynthesis and respiration under climate change. Despite rising global carbon fluxes and biomass stocks, tipping point risks remain: in tropical regions, increased photosynthesis (0.1 PgC yr − 1 ) is offset by rising respiration (0.05 PgC yr − 1 ). • A hybrid, process-informed ML framework reconciles carbon flux estimates. • GPP estimates are consistent across methods, but ecosystem respiration diverges. • Carbon sink responses vary, rising respiration offsets CO 2 gains in tropics.

Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyVol. 385
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (GB), Lund University (SE), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Observatoire de Paris (FR), Parc Científic de la Universitat de València (ES), Sorbonne Université (FR), UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB), Institute of Landscape Ecology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), National Space Science Center (CN), Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (FR), CEA Paris-Saclay (FR), University of Southampton (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.