Why employees withhold knowledge: the role of job demands, unfairness perceptions and knowledge power threat in a healthcare setting

PURPOSE: While job demands are commonly linked to burnout and disengagement, their influence on knowledge withholding remains underexplored, particularly in high-stakes healthcare settings where knowledge sharing is critical. Specifically, existing frameworks explain general stress responses but do not account for knowledge-specific and strategic decisions, nor the cognitive mechanisms underlying such behaviour. This study investigates the psychological mechanisms and boundary conditions through which job demands lead to knowledge withholding. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Drawing on conservation of resources (COR) theory, this study examines the mediating role of perceived reward-effort unfairness and the moderating role of knowledge power threat (KPT). Data were collected using a time-lagged design from 316 healthcare professionals across multiple organisations in the UAE. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to test the hypothesised relationships. FINDINGS: The results indicate that job demands positively influence knowledge withholding through perceived unfairness in reward-effort balance. This suggests that employees cognitively interpret resource imbalances as unfair, which in turn shapes knowledge-related decisions. Moreover, the relationship is intensified by KPT, reflecting employees' anticipatory concerns about losing knowledge-based influence and professional value, leading to stronger knowledge withholding behaviour. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The findings highlight the importance of managing workload, ensuring fair reward systems and fostering trust-based leadership to reduce knowledge withholding and promote knowledge-sharing behaviours in healthcare organisations. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This study provides a more precise explanation of knowledge withholding by integrating resource-based, cognitive and power-related perspectives, with KPT introduced as a novel boundary condition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Organization and Management
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jhom-03-2025-0161
Primary Topic
Knowledge Management and Sharing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why employees withhold knowledge: the role of job demands, unfairness perceptions and knowledge power threat in a healthcare setting

Mohamed Aboelmaged, Safeya Almazrouei, Shaker Bani-Melhem, Faridahwati Mohd-Shamsudin et al.
Journal of Health Organization and Management
Knowledge Management and Sharing
article

Why employees withhold knowledge: the role of job demands, unfairness perceptions and knowledge power threat in a healthcare setting

Mohamed Aboelmaged, Safeya Almazrouei, Shaker Bani-Melhem, Faridahwati Mohd-Shamsudin, Fathyia Almarzoqee, Muhammad Usman
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: While job demands are commonly linked to burnout and disengagement, their influence on knowledge withholding remains underexplored, particularly in high-stakes healthcare settings where knowledge sharing is critical. Specifically, existing frameworks explain general stress responses but do not account for knowledge-specific and strategic decisions, nor the cognitive mechanisms underlying such behaviour. This study investigates the psychological mechanisms and boundary conditions through which job demands lead to knowledge withholding. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Drawing on conservation of resources (COR) theory, this study examines the mediating role of perceived reward-effort unfairness and the moderating role of knowledge power threat (KPT). Data were collected using a time-lagged design from 316 healthcare professionals across multiple organisations in the UAE. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to test the hypothesised relationships. FINDINGS: The results indicate that job demands positively influence knowledge withholding through perceived unfairness in reward-effort balance. This suggests that employees cognitively interpret resource imbalances as unfair, which in turn shapes knowledge-related decisions. Moreover, the relationship is intensified by KPT, reflecting employees' anticipatory concerns about losing knowledge-based influence and professional value, leading to stronger knowledge withholding behaviour. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The findings highlight the importance of managing workload, ensuring fair reward systems and fostering trust-based leadership to reduce knowledge withholding and promote knowledge-sharing behaviours in healthcare organisations. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This study provides a more precise explanation of knowledge withholding by integrating resource-based, cognitive and power-related perspectives, with KPT introduced as a novel boundary condition.

Journal of Health Organization and Management
University of Sharjah (AE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Knowledge Management and Sharing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.