From Basics to Benchmarks: Evaluating Sample Adequacy, <scp>PD</scp> ‐ <scp>L1</scp> Expression, and Molecular Profiling in Effusion Samples of Lung Adenocarcinoma

ABSTRACT Introduction Lung adenocarcinoma commonly causes malignant pleural effusion (MPE), a condition with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Pleural effusion specimens offer a minimally invasive source for diagnosis and molecular testing. This study evaluates cytologic adequacy for molecular analysis, characterizes mutational and PD‐L1 profiles, and correlates findings with survival outcomes. Methods Over 10 years, a review of 2400 MPE identified 94 lung adenocarcinoma cases that underwent next generation sequencing (NGS). Patient demographics, cytological characteristics, molecular features, and survival outcome were integrated for analysis. Results The mean effusion volume submitted for cytological and molecular testing was 589.8 mL (range 4–2790 mL) and mean tumor cellularity was 40% (range 10%–90%). NGS identified mutations in 86/94 cases (91%). TP53 was the most common alteration (42/94, 44.6%). FDA‐approved biomarkers were detected: KRAS (28/94, 29.7%); EGFR (15/94, 15.9%); BRAF (8/94, 8.5%); ALK (3/94, 4.2%), ROS1 (2/94, 2.1%), RET fusions (1/94, 1%); and MET amplification (2/94, 2.1%). Smoking was associated with bloody effusions ( p = 0.049), frequent TP53 mutations ( p = 0.018), and fewer EGFR mutations ( p = 0.012). Patients with effusions as primary presentation was associated with higher mortality ( p = 0.002), frequent TTF‐1 positivity ( p = &lt; 0.001) and frequent BRAF mutations ( p = 0.049). TTF‐1 positivity was associated with higher PD‐L1 scores ( p = 0.035). Survival was shorter in male patients ( p = 0.045), smokers ( p = 0.025), concurrent pericardial effusions ( p = 0.027), and with TP53 mutation ( p = 0.002). Conclusions Molecular testing of effusion samples is feasible even at low fluid volumes, provided tumor cellularity is adequate. Prioritizing tumor fraction over volume ensures a higher likelihood of successful molecular analysis. Effusion‐based NGS reliably identifies actionable alterations with diagnostic and prognostic relevance. Male patients, smokers, concurrent or primary presentation with MPE, and those with TP53 mutations had poorer outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostic Cytopathology
Published
2026-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.70132
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Basics to Benchmarks: Evaluating Sample Adequacy, PD ‐ L1 Expression, and Molecular Profiling in Effusion Samples of Lung Adenocarcinoma

Omid Savari, Claire Michael, Navid Sadri, Aparna Harbhajanka et al.
Diagnostic Cytopathology
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

From Basics to Benchmarks: Evaluating Sample Adequacy, PD ‐ L1 Expression, and Molecular Profiling in Effusion Samples of Lung Adenocarcinoma

Omid Savari, Claire Michael, Navid Sadri, Aparna Harbhajanka, Harpreet Virk, Keri Ann Pfeil
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Lung adenocarcinoma commonly causes malignant pleural effusion (MPE), a condition with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Pleural effusion specimens offer a minimally invasive source for diagnosis and molecular testing. This study evaluates cytologic adequacy for molecular analysis, characterizes mutational and PD‐L1 profiles, and correlates findings with survival outcomes. Methods Over 10 years, a review of 2400 MPE identified 94 lung adenocarcinoma cases that underwent next generation sequencing (NGS). Patient demographics, cytological characteristics, molecular features, and survival outcome were integrated for analysis. Results The mean effusion volume submitted for cytological and molecular testing was 589.8 mL (range 4–2790 mL) and mean tumor cellularity was 40% (range 10%–90%). NGS identified mutations in 86/94 cases (91%). TP53 was the most common alteration (42/94, 44.6%). FDA‐approved biomarkers were detected: KRAS (28/94, 29.7%); EGFR (15/94, 15.9%); BRAF (8/94, 8.5%); ALK (3/94, 4.2%), ROS1 (2/94, 2.1%), RET fusions (1/94, 1%); and MET amplification (2/94, 2.1%). Smoking was associated with bloody effusions ( p = 0.049), frequent TP53 mutations ( p = 0.018), and fewer EGFR mutations ( p = 0.012). Patients with effusions as primary presentation was associated with higher mortality ( p = 0.002), frequent TTF‐1 positivity ( p = &lt; 0.001) and frequent BRAF mutations ( p = 0.049). TTF‐1 positivity was associated with higher PD‐L1 scores ( p = 0.035). Survival was shorter in male patients ( p = 0.045), smokers ( p = 0.025), concurrent pericardial effusions ( p = 0.027), and with TP53 mutation ( p = 0.002). Conclusions Molecular testing of effusion samples is feasible even at low fluid volumes, provided tumor cellularity is adequate. Prioritizing tumor fraction over volume ensures a higher likelihood of successful molecular analysis. Effusion‐based NGS reliably identifies actionable alterations with diagnostic and prognostic relevance. Male patients, smokers, concurrent or primary presentation with MPE, and those with TP53 mutations had poorer outcomes.

Diagnostic Cytopathology
University Hospitals of Cleveland (US), Center for Clinical Research (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.