Highlights of the 2nd Interdisciplinary NFDI Metadata Workshop

The German National Research Data Infrastructure (NFDI) unifies activities across all scientific disciplines, represented by NFDI consortia, to realise an overarching research data management. Interdisciplinary domain analysis and agreement on common metadata standards for the description of research outputs are key elements for a successful FAIR implementation. The Taskforce Metadata within the NFDI Section (Meta)data, Terminologies, Provenance coordinates the community process of assessing existing cross-disciplinary terminologies and metadata schemas as suitable candidates for NFDI-agreed recommendations. A first workshop was held in Dresden in January 2025 to begin alignment on metadata [1]. Here, we present the results of the second interactive workshop organized by the Taskforce at the TIB Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology in June 2025. The goal was to identify and evaluate suitable existing generic metadata schemas and provide recommendations on how to apply these schemas in the individual disciplines. Altogether, 61 participants from 25 NFDI consortia discussed common metadata schemas, disciplinary needs, and standardisation approaches. The recommendation from the first workshop supporting the registration of repositories in re3data was reaffirmed. Thus, the consensus is now being translated into the official NFDI recommendation document. Additionally, breakout sessions facilitated cross-disciplinary discussions on using the metadata schemas identified in the first workshop – DCAT-AP, DataCite and schema.org – and how to connect these to disciplinary schemas. The Taskforce Metadata recommends that NFDI consortia adopt at least one of these three standards, thereby advancing interoperability on an international level, e.g. in the EOSC context. [1] A. Czerniak, L. J. Castro, H. Fliegl, J. Grieb, C. Henzen, O. Koepler, J. Moore, E. Söding, U. Stervbo, T. Trippel, C. Wiljes, Building Bridges through Metadata within the NFDI, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17195542 and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16735955

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19732521
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Highlights of the 2nd Interdisciplinary NFDI Metadata Workshop

Thorsten Trippel, Christin Henzen, Ulrik Stervbo, Oliver Koepler et al.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Research Data Management Practices
article

Highlights of the 2nd Interdisciplinary NFDI Metadata Workshop

Thorsten Trippel, Christin Henzen, Ulrik Stervbo, Oliver Koepler, Leyla Jael Castro, Emanuel Söding, Andreas Czerniak, Cord Wiljes, Heike Fliegl, Josh Moore
article en

Abstract

The German National Research Data Infrastructure (NFDI) unifies activities across all scientific disciplines, represented by NFDI consortia, to realise an overarching research data management. Interdisciplinary domain analysis and agreement on common metadata standards for the description of research outputs are key elements for a successful FAIR implementation. The Taskforce Metadata within the NFDI Section (Meta)data, Terminologies, Provenance coordinates the community process of assessing existing cross-disciplinary terminologies and metadata schemas as suitable candidates for NFDI-agreed recommendations. A first workshop was held in Dresden in January 2025 to begin alignment on metadata [1]. Here, we present the results of the second interactive workshop organized by the Taskforce at the TIB Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology in June 2025. The goal was to identify and evaluate suitable existing generic metadata schemas and provide recommendations on how to apply these schemas in the individual disciplines. Altogether, 61 participants from 25 NFDI consortia discussed common metadata schemas, disciplinary needs, and standardisation approaches. The recommendation from the first workshop supporting the registration of repositories in re3data was reaffirmed. Thus, the consensus is now being translated into the official NFDI recommendation document. Additionally, breakout sessions facilitated cross-disciplinary discussions on using the metadata schemas identified in the first workshop – DCAT-AP, DataCite and schema.org – and how to connect these to disciplinary schemas. The Taskforce Metadata recommends that NFDI consortia adopt at least one of these three standards, thereby advancing interoperability on an international level, e.g. in the EOSC context. [1] A. Czerniak, L. J. Castro, H. Fliegl, J. Grieb, C. Henzen, O. Koepler, J. Moore, E. Söding, U. Stervbo, T. Trippel, C. Wiljes, Building Bridges through Metadata within the NFDI, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17195542 and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16735955

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
FIZ Karlsruhe – Leibniz Institute for Information Infrastructure (DE), Bielefeld University (DE), Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB) (DE), GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (DE), Gesellschaft für Klinische Forschung (DE), Leibniz Institute for the German Language (DE), ZB MED - Information Centre for Life Sciences (DE), German Council for Scientific Information Infrastructures (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), University of Tübingen (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.