Validation of Profilometry‐Based Indentation Plastometry (PIP) Testing for Rapid Qualification of Electron Beam‐Powder Bed Fusion (EB‐PBF) With Ti–6Al–4V Builds

Alloy additive manufacturing demonstrates significant promise for use in structural and functional applications involving extreme temperatures and pressures. Advances in electron beam‐based additive manufacturing are especially interesting for near‐net‐shape refractory alloy‐based components. However, it is critical to address the ability to consistently manufacture components with desired thermomechanical properties. This article employs profilometry‐based indentation plastometry (PIP) for rapid evaluation of thermomechanical properties of Ti–6Al–4V builds manufactured by a new electron beam‐powder bed fusion (EB‐PBF) instrument. PIP results are validated by a set of multiscale characterization techniques: nanoindentation, Vickers microhardness, and conventional tensile testing. Microstructure is characterized to understand the structure–process–mechanical property relationships. Average yield strength from room‐temperature PIP (909–934 MPa) closely matches average yield from tensile testing (912 MPa). High‐temperature (600°C) PIP showed a 45% yield strength reduction. Creep effects are investigated at room and elevated temperature with a range of tip velocities and strain rates, and strain sensitivity values were calculated: m RT = 0.018, m 600°C = 0.16. At room temperature, PIP is capable of predicting mechanical properties up to 4x faster than conventional mechanical testing methods. Results show consistent properties across manufactured component with some deviation when probing properties along the EB‐PBF melt layer axis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Engineering Materials
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202502047
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of Profilometry‐Based Indentation Plastometry (PIP) Testing for Rapid Qualification of Electron Beam‐Powder Bed Fusion (EB‐PBF) With Ti–6Al–4V Builds

Stephen Puplampu, Bradley Howell Jared, Dayakar Penumadu, Andrew T. Wood et al.
Advanced Engineering Materials
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Validation of Profilometry‐Based Indentation Plastometry (PIP) Testing for Rapid Qualification of Electron Beam‐Powder Bed Fusion (EB‐PBF) With Ti–6Al–4V Builds

Stephen Puplampu, Bradley Howell Jared, Dayakar Penumadu, Andrew T. Wood, Sudarsanam Babu, Keaton McNulty
article en

Abstract

Alloy additive manufacturing demonstrates significant promise for use in structural and functional applications involving extreme temperatures and pressures. Advances in electron beam‐based additive manufacturing are especially interesting for near‐net‐shape refractory alloy‐based components. However, it is critical to address the ability to consistently manufacture components with desired thermomechanical properties. This article employs profilometry‐based indentation plastometry (PIP) for rapid evaluation of thermomechanical properties of Ti–6Al–4V builds manufactured by a new electron beam‐powder bed fusion (EB‐PBF) instrument. PIP results are validated by a set of multiscale characterization techniques: nanoindentation, Vickers microhardness, and conventional tensile testing. Microstructure is characterized to understand the structure–process–mechanical property relationships. Average yield strength from room‐temperature PIP (909–934 MPa) closely matches average yield from tensile testing (912 MPa). High‐temperature (600°C) PIP showed a 45% yield strength reduction. Creep effects are investigated at room and elevated temperature with a range of tip velocities and strain rates, and strain sensitivity values were calculated: m RT = 0.018, m 600°C = 0.16. At room temperature, PIP is capable of predicting mechanical properties up to 4x faster than conventional mechanical testing methods. Results show consistent properties across manufactured component with some deviation when probing properties along the EB‐PBF melt layer axis.

Advanced Engineering Materials
Knoxville College (US), Stony Brook University (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.